#NCSEN: Beware of shih-tzu!








John Frank — N&O executive editor John Drescher’s attack shih-tzu — is apparently lobbying for a full-time gig in the lap of his master.  The boy wonder put together quite a hit piece on  Greg Brannon — the Tea Party’s favorite in the US Senate GOP primary:

Let’s take a look at the Greg Brannon coalition announced so far: Rand Paul and Ann Coulter. 

And let’s consider the new Public Policy Polling numbers that put Brannon as the only Republican candidate besting Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan right now.

All GOP candidates – including the more prominent challengers, Thom Tillis and Mark Harris – are within the margin of Hagan. But the idea that Brannon may have the “best” chance of beating Hagan is intriguing, especially given the unanswered questions hanging over his plagiarism controversy.

Let’s see — taking a principled stand on defending the verbiage of The Constitution vs. sex with lobbyists / pay-to-play / weakness on immigration and the environment / political ties to Richard Morgan & Jim Black vs being the 60th vote for ObamaCare.  Now, which one of those three paths am I going to stake my future — and that of my state and my country — on?

It’s amazing that Frank is even printing Greg Brannon’s name.  Frank and the rest of the newsroom crew went months without mentioning Brannon’s name — even though he was the first candidate out of the gate.

That lede surely earned Frank a few “good boy” ‘s and pats on the head from Master Drescher.  But, wait.  It gets worse:

The question is whether his support will last as his views become more well known. In an interview last week, Brannon told Dome that he believed the federal government has only two roles: protect free trade and provide national defense. It should do nothing else; the rest is for the states. His position fits with tea party credo but how it plays with mainstream Republicans and then independents (if he gets to the general election) is unclear. Plenty of questions remain. In a speech, Brannon also suggested a change in the hearts and minds of the American people led to the end of slavery and made no mention of the Civil War. His views are sure to get more attention in coming weeks and the poll numbers may change as a result.

Ah, the old Confederacy slander ploy.  Frank tried a similar ploy against Pat McCrory during the 2012 campaign — for “daring” to have a meeting in a restaurant that had a Rebel flag on display. It didn’t work too well on ol’ Pat.  You would have thought the shih-tzu would have learned his lesson.  But, sadly, NO.

What slavery has to do with 2013 America is beyond me. (It’s interesting that a reporter for a newspaper founded by a Klan sympathizer that also played a leading role in inciting the racial violence in Wilmington in 1898  is raising questions about someone else’s views on race. But I digress.)   MORE: 

But for now, the Democratic Party sounds downright gleeful that Brannon is getting so much attention, calling him a fringe candidate. “The Republican field has been spoiling for a fight for months, and more and more it looks like they’re going to have one with each other,” said Ben Ray, a Democratic Party spokesman.

Seriously.  What Republican DOESN’T get labeled “fringe” by the Democrat rapid response / opposition research coordinator?

I’ve met little John.  He’s expressed frustration to me about the Brannon camp not returning his calls.  I don’t think stuff like this is going to help warm Team Brannon up to him.  



7 thoughts on “#NCSEN: Beware of shih-tzu!

  1. The problem for Brannon will be Rove and the onslaught of negative ads portraying Brannon and Harris as extreme and too far right and showing Tillis as the center right candidate who would vote to eliminate Obamacare.Rove will find one or two social issues on the far right and pound and pound Brannon and Harris on them.And you can bet he will have millions more than Brannon.Brannon must have a ground game run like a swiss watch and not get trapped in Rove’s game.Rove is not good at getting his voters to the polls and especially not good at following up to see they have actually voted in primaries.This is where Brannon can overcome the money discrepanc.A good ground game that is effective is the toughest part of a campaign and the hardest to run.

    1. I largely agree – that GOP wing is going to be tough to overcome, and I have no idea how well (or not) Brannon is going to be able to respond. He has a VERY small margin of error, if he has one at all.

      The main problem with that strategy, for me anyway, is that the alternative presented is not one I’m interested in, and I dont know that a lot (well, enough) of NC people are either. That is – Tillis is a non-starter for me. He’s just not getting my vote.

      1. Brannon needs to tie Tillis to amnesty for illegals, Rove is one avenue to do that. He needs to start now painted Tillis as weak on illegal immigration.

        Rove is also a wussy on fighting Obamacare, and that connection should be made to Tillis. Burr is another avenue of attack here. Tilis, Burr, and Rove are all talk and no do on Obamacare.

  2. 1) I’m sorry I ended up giving the N&O an extra page view… I feel a bit dirty now, and not in a good way.

    2) This “the tea party wants anarchy and really loves slavery and the Confederacy” innuendo nonsense is really tiresome.

    3) Bannon at the moment continues to be the only candidate in that race I’m interested in seeing elected, since he actually seems to have a decent clue about the appropriate size and scope of government. Hope he continues to rise.

    4) I wouldnt return the dude’s calls either. Either way, a piece like this is gonna be the result – there is no way that’s gonna end in anything resembling a fair shake, and there’s no need to help ’em out. That particular game is most certainly rigged.

    5) “But for now, the Democratic Party sounds downright gleeful that Brannon is getting so much attention, calling him a fringe candidate.”

    Yep, they do so love to belittle and try to re-package opponents as “fringe”nut jobs, whether they are or not. Hopefully Brannon isnt. My own problem with that kinda thinking is… if the answer is the big-government Republican to avoid the maybe-slightly-bigger Democrat, I dont think I care much. I certainly dont have to participate in that kind of “choice” (<– air quotes).

Comments are closed.