NCGOPers in DC blindly stick with Boehner on pork-laden, big-spending “farm bill”

capitolThe US House narrowly voted down a bloated “Farm” Bill — that was more food stamps and welfare than actual farm stuff.  Unfortunately, it took most of the Democrats — ticked about a microscopic cut in food stamps, and the few good conservatives left in the House GOP caucus — to finish off this disaster.

Sad but truemost of the members of North Carolina’s alleged conservative party stuck with John Boehner and Eric Cantor and voted FOR the “farm bill.”   The two profiles in courage — and NO votes — from NC were Walter Jones and Robert Pittenger.   Voting YES were: Coble, Ellmers, Foxx, Meadows, McHenry, Hudson, and Holding.

What was so bad about this “farm bill”?  Let’s turn to Josh Withrow with FreedomWorks:

Republicans claim to be the party of free markets and limited government, yet belie that claim every five years by overwhelmingly voting to support a new farm bill, filled with government interventions into agriculture and market-distorting subsidies. This week, the House is voting on its next “Five Year Plan,” a disasterpiece of corporate welfare, Soviet-style price controls, and entitlement spending.

Of course, the farm bill is sold to the American public as a lifeline for struggling American family farms. The idea of the small farm family, the ultimate symbol of hard work and self-dependence, tugs at the heartstrings of every conservative Yet the farm bill has actually contributed to the demise of the small farmer by pouring money into wealthy farm corporations.

Indeed, the vast majority of the agricultural spending in the bill goes to farms with annual incomes above $250,000 per year.  And because the farm bill’s money is paid out based upon the amount of acres and crops planted, the largest agribusinesses are able to use more of that money to further expand and cut smaller competitors out of the market.

More odious is the preferential treatment given to certain industries over others – a classic example of lobbyists compelling the government to pick winners and losers in the marketplace.  Sugar, corn, rice, peanuts, cotton, soybeans, and dairy are only some of the crops whose producers have snared massively profitable sweetheart deals through the farm bill.

These special carve-outs distort agriculture markets, encouraging farmers to plant the crops that are government favored, instead of responding to the desires of consumers. If you’re wondering why beef is so expensive nowadays, it’s partially because farmers who used to grow feed corn are now growing corn to be used for ethanol – because the government pays them generously to do so. So feed corn, and the cattle that eat it, get more expensive.

Then there is the treatment of crop insurance, which is subsidized every which way.  First, taxpayers pay nearly 60 percent of the premiums for catastrophic crop insurance coverage.  This extremely generous subsidy encourages farmers to take out more extensive coverage than they would need, and also to plant on lands that are riskier because any losses are taken care of.  Second, the insurance companies themselves also get paid a generous portion of what they have to pay out, further ensuring that farmers and insurance companies alike enjoy safe profits.

And if the current insurance subsidies aren’t generous enough, the Republican-led House is agreeing to add a brand new entitlement to the farm bill – shallow loss insurance.  Instead of simply covering catastrophic losses, the shallow-loss program covers the difference when farm revenues fall below their five-year average.  Farmers are currently experiencing their highest average revenues ever, and thanks to the shallow loss program they’ll keep on experiencing record profits after prices go back to normal.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, most of the farm bill’s spending has literally nothing to do with farms and crops at all.  Food stamps take up eighty percent of the farm bill’s cost, having expanded over seventy percent in just the past five years.  The food stamp program, technically known as SNAP (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), is the second largest means-tested welfare program in the U.S., behind only Medicaid. Yet Republicans who want their farm subsidies to pass use food stamps as an $800 billion earmark to get Democrats to help pass the Farm Bill (and the Democrats are similarly happy to have Republicans vote to pass food stamps).  It’s political logrolling at its finest – everyone gets their bloated welfare bill passed, and no one tries to reform either of them.

With all of the things that are wrong with this abomination of a bill, there is no way any fiscal conservative should ever vote for it.

Congressman Richard Hudson needs special recognition for his gall.   On the day before he voted FOR this travesty — which was opposed by FreedomWorks AND the Tea Party — on the House floor,  Hudson told a gathering of Freedomworks / Tea Party activists on the Capitol lawn that he was with them.  (I guess he meant he was standing in the same vicinity with them — not that he was supporting their agenda.) 

Withrow adds:

It is important to note that the Republican leadership could have attracted the support of many of the conservatives who voted against the bill if they had just allowed votes on amendments to make major reforms to key parts of the bill. Instead, they kept the best conservative reforms to food stamps and crop insurance off the floor and ensured that the final bill would continue to harvest taxpayer dollars to sow bad policies.

If this doesn’t make it clear — that John Boehner’s and Eric Cantor’s opinions matter more than ours  — I don’t know what will. 

3 thoughts on “NCGOPers in DC blindly stick with Boehner on pork-laden, big-spending “farm bill”

  1. Looks like Jones and Pittenger are the only members of Congress who vote for fiscal sanity. We need to get to work to replace the others. It looks like there is already a serious primary candidate gearing up to take on Coble, and I hear rumblings of the same on Ellmers. Cantor / Boehner brownnoser Hudson is another one who needs a primary badly.

    1. Funny how Coble has been regarded over the years as one of the most conservative members in Congress. Looks like his talk is more conservative than his voting record. I’ll be the first to admit it, he had me fooled until about six months ago when I really started paying attention to his voting record, his Ripon Society membership, etc.

      Yeah, Meadows and Webb will definitely run against him but a lot of folks don’t pay attention to things like we do and will vote for Coble because they always have, he’s such a nice guy, etc.

      The guy over in the 13th District who campaigned on cutting spending, on the other hand, will probably not get a serious primary because where Coble wins on charisma, Holding will not be outspent by anyone who might consider challenging him.

      Ellmers’ race might be the most interesting IF she has a serious challenger…..the most successful challenger she faced last primary had enough cash to finance maybe one round of radio ads. It will take more than that.

      1. The Club for Growth has targeted Ellmers. If they get the candidate they want in the race, that will translate into big bucks against her. I hope that those interested in taking her out are in touch with the Club.

Comments are closed.