#ncpol: Colon & Dallas — Two geniuses. (Count ’em.)

DallasElections have been challenged time and time again throughout American history.  The most recent?  2000, Gore v. Bush.    John Kerry has recently been musing about how Bush stole 2004 from him.

Yet, with all of the stories out there to cover — Dallas’s brother and his friends inciting violence at Trump events, The Clinton Foundation, pay-to-play, local governments having to go private to work around Roy Cooper’s crime lab — Colon Campbell can only find (1) the perpetual search for genitalia, and (2) Hillary Clinton talking points:

captureccdw

Of course, Dallas makes it worse by playing into this dingleberry’s hands.  Trump DID NOT SAY ELECTION RESULTS ARE OPTIONAL. He has made the case that monkey download-10business is going on, and — if he sees it in the election returns — he may very well do something about it.   Hillary partisans are trying to make it sound authoritarian of Trump to not give Hillary a hug after he – -in their view — gets smoked on Election Day.

 Donald Trump is a private businessman with no influence over the military or the rest of the national security apparatus.   In 2000 , we had the sitting VP of the US declining to concede the election and step down.  Next in line to the presidency.  (THAT was scary.  THAT was authoritarian. )

I hope Colon enjoys working for Univision.  (Maybe his new jefe will make him finally tell the truth about HB2.)

I hope the GOPe types in Raleigh appreciate the utter mess Dallas has made since he was foisted on the party.  I am certainly not going to enjoy living in this state or country if Colon and his buddies get their way. 

6 thoughts on “#ncpol: Colon & Dallas — Two geniuses. (Count ’em.)

  1. This seems to be par for the course with the Woodhouse-run NCGOPe. They also parroted Hillary’s talking points about Trump potty mouth tape. Whose side is Woodhouse on?

  2. the question asked of us was about all our candidates not trump. We answered the specific question about what should our candidates do IF they lose

    1. What part of election fraud do you not understand? Or are you just a piss poor communicator?

      It should be the chairman making statements for the party, not the office boy. But maybe our present titular chairman is not up to the job.

Comments are closed.