Study: NC is smacked hard by federal regs

George Mason University’s Mercatus Center has produced some biggovtthought-provoking research illustrating just how much of an impact DC has on each of the states: 

The federal regulation and state enterprise (“FRASE”) index ranks the 50 states and the District of Columbia according to how federal regulations affect each state’s economy. Over the past 80 years, the federal government has increasingly relied on regulations as its primary legal output. Although federal regulation applies in the same way in all states, each state’s economy includes a unique mix of industries. As a result, federal policies that target specific sectors of the economy will affect states in different ways.

In its most recent edition, the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), which annually compiles all current federal regulations, numbers more than 175,000 pages in 236 volumes. Those pages contain over one million individual restrictions that mandate or prohibit some activity. And those numbers are growing: by restriction count, the CFR is nearly twice as large as it was in 1975[…]big_government_bullsh

FRASE uses RegData, a dataset that quantifies federal regulations by identifying individual regulatory restrictions in the CFR and estimating their relevance to different industries in the economy. FRASE weights the number of restrictions targeting each industry according to its importance to a particular state relative to that industry’s importance to the nation as a whole. For example, if an industry contributes twice as much to the state’s economy as it does to the nation’s, the restrictions count twice as much. The index sums the result across all industries in the state and scales to the score for the nation overall.

A FRASE index score of 1 means that federal regulations affect a state to precisely the same degree that they do the nation as a whole. A score higher than 1 means federal regulations have a higher impact on the state than on the nation, and a score less than 1 means they have a lower impact on the state.feed

So, to clarify, when they talk here about ”impact”  — they are talking about restrictions handed down by Uncle Sam.  And don’t forget — each of these regulations means added cost to me and you.

Here’s what the researchers found about North Carolina: 

[…] For 2013, North Carolina ranked 14th for impact of federal regulation, with a score of 1.15 on the FRASE index. By design, the FRASE index for the United States overall in any year will equal 1, so a score of 1.15 indicates that the impact of federal regulation on North Carolina feedindustries was 15 percent higher than the impact on the nation overall.

Although the ratio of the impact of federal regulation on the state to its impact on the nation fluctuates some from year to year, more dramatic growth has occurred in the total number of regulatory restrictions affecting North Carolina since 1997. One way to measure this impact is to scale the weighted restrictions to the total weighted restrictions for the national econ- omy in 1997. Doing so allows us to calculate the growth of the FRASE index relative to 1997. We call this the constant-basis FRASE index. For North Carolina, the constant-basis FRASE index has grown by 42 percent from 1997 to 2013.[…] 

Snip20160716_2

 

Snip20160716_4

Snip20160716_3

2 thoughts on “Study: NC is smacked hard by federal regs

  1. You already KNOW the answer. MOST of this BS is directly attributable to federal departments or agencies that are NOT CONSTITUTIONAL. Anything which is NOT supported by a plain reading of Article 1 Section 8 should be CLOSED, DEFUNDED, and the bureaucrats TERMINATED. Then MOST of this FedGov BS would GO AWAY!!! Go read Art 1 Sec 8 some time (like NOW). It’s only 429 words. In it, you’ll never see words like environment, energy, education, agriculture, healthcare, housing, consumer protection, yada yada yada. The list is almost endless. ALL of these functions must be attacked with a MEAT AXE, not a scalpel. The word “commerce” is in Art 1 Sec 8, but ONLY in the opening summary clause. The Framers meant ONLY to ensure that states did not set up tariffs and hinder free trade among themselves. So the Dept. of Commerce should be CLOSED, too.

    1. Can we expect ANY of that from Burr and Tillis? If not, why should we reelect either of them? What has either of them done to stop Obama’s reg?

Comments are closed.