Repeat after me: Mo’ Money, Mo’ Money, Mo’ Money … (C’mon! Everybody!)

momoneyThe drumbeat continues.  Local governments and their lobbyists are gung-ho on the idea of digging deeper into our already ravaged wallets.  They’ve been spinning us for days now about how the mean ol’ GOP in Raleigh has hurt them financially.  I’m not hearing a peep about fiscal responsibility or cutting spending.  *They’re gonna spend.  We need to cough up more.  Case frickin’ closed.*

Well, another shoe has dropped in this quest for mo’ money:

Cities and towns could ask state legislators for a special sales tax within municipal boundaries to make up for $62 million in lost privilege tax revenues.

The legislature earlier this year repealed the privilege tax, which opponents consider an unfair and uneven way to tax businesses. But mayors fear they’ll have to raise property taxes to fill the budget hole, and they want other revenue options.

With the privilege tax repeal going into effect in July, revenue was the hot topic Thursday as the N.C. League of Municipalities set its lobbying priorities for the new legislative session.

“Our foundation was always low property taxes,” said Paul Meyer, the league’s executive director. “As city revenues decline, the only place elected officials can go is to the property tax … and that’s going to hurt our economic development.”

The only place to go ????  <Ahem>  *COUGH* Spending Cuts? Responsible budgeting? *COUGH, COUGH*

Gov. Pat McCrory pledged his help in finding replacement revenue for the privilege tax.

“I’m going to hold (legislators’) feet to the fire and remind them,” McCrory said. “We’re interested in figuring out how to make up that revenue and give you more options at the city and county level regarding revenue streams.”

Oh, goody.  Never mind asking them to tighten their belts first.  We’ve all been doing that for some time in this godawful economy. MORE:

[…] The League of Municipalities’ legislative agenda approved Thursday calls on legislators to give sales taxing power to cities and towns. Currently, only the state and counties have that power – a city sales tax, if approved, would come on top of existing state and county sales tax

The league also recommends the state apply sales taxes to more services, though it doesn’t specify which ones. Last year, the legislature expanded the tax to apply to admission tickets for sports, movies and other events.

Cities and towns could join counties in charging hotel occupancy taxes as well. Getting that power is also on the league’s wish list, with the goal of funding services and infrastructure “in order to support travel and tourism.”

Okay.  So, increasing property taxes is going to hurt economic development, but piling on a FOURTH level of sales tax WON’T ???  Given the fact that we have a GOP majority on Jones Street, it might lead one to think this agenda has no chance in hell of passing.  (But, never say NO CHANCE.  Look back at the ol’ CRomnibus thing in DC.) 

1 thought on “Repeat after me: Mo’ Money, Mo’ Money, Mo’ Money … (C’mon! Everybody!)

  1. Wait ’til local governments figure out that if they want that interstate project they’ve been waiting for, they’ll have to collect taxes locally in order to move their project up the priority list… or agree to tolling, just another form of local taxes:

    “The Department may revise highway project selection ratings based on local government funding initiatives and capital construction funding directly attributable to highway toll revenue.”

    But hey, the State cut taxes, right?

    And one more whack to city budgets on the horizon: sales tax redistribution “reform”. Currently, the sales taxes collected across the State go into a big pot in Raleigh. They take a share, and then of the remainder, 75% goes back to the counties who generated it, and 25% is distributed by a population formula that sends some of it to counties who didn’t raise a lot of sales tax revenue.

    When it gets back to the counties, they take a disproportionate share out for their own budgets, and for smaller municipal budgets. For example, in 2009, businesses within the City of Asheville sent $120 million to Raleigh. Only $14 million of that made it back to Asheville’s budget, whereas the unincorporated parts of Buncombe County only collected $28 million, but received back $47 million.

    So that’s the state of affairs now. The cities are subsidizing smaller town and county budgets to a huge degree, and even more to rural county budgets. The NCGA is now considering taking away even more of that money from the larger county and municipal budgets and sending it to parts of the state that aren’t generating much sales taxes at all. Yay ‘redistribution of wealth’!

    I know that we hate the mostly-Democratic-run cities, but at what point do you worry about killing the golden goose?

Comments are closed.