‘The hard toll of easy guns’

Gun-Control*SIGH*.

That’s the headline of the N&O op-ed that is being echoed and cheered by Blinkin’ Chris and his comrades at Goodmon, Inc. Rush Limbaugh used to have an “SUV update” parody segment, where he made fun of various drive-by reports that blamed actual automobiles — and NOT the people driving them — for various and sundry car accidents.

The N&O’s Ned Barnett is carrying on that tradition, but with guns:

The Feb. 10 murders of three young people in Chapel Hill seemed another spasm of American gun violence. But soon there was a strong national, even global assertion that this view ignores the real cause.

OK, I’ll bite.  Ned, WHAT was “the real cause”?

Relatives of the victims said the killings were a hate crime in which the three students were targeted because they were Muslims. The relatives said the alleged shooter, Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, went to a neighboring condominium in the quiet complex where he lived near the University of North Carolina and fatally shot Deah Barakat, 23; his wife, Yusor Abu-Salha, 21; and her sister, Razan Abu-Salha, 19, as the final of several encounters in which an animosity toward Muslims was the subtext.

People scoured Hicks’ Facebook page for evidence of such hate. The findings were conflicting. Hicks posted that he was an “anti-theist” hostile to all religions. He also posted sentiments about tolerance, including toward the rights of same-sex couples to marry and even the right of Muslims to open a mosque near the site of the 9/11 terror attack in New York City. He also expressed his love of guns.

*Ah, but of course. *

Hicks’ wife said her husband harbors no hatred of Muslims. Neighbors in the complex said he was a bully-at-large about enforcing assigned and visitor parking spaces. He walked around with a gun in his belt and called the towing company so many times that it stopped responding. But those who see the killings as Muslim-related said even a strange, angry man with a gun doesn’t kill people over a parking space.nb

That makes sense, but gun violence is often senseless. This is America, gun-besotted, gun-crazy America. Anger and bullets mix every day. Often the anger is about minor things – the honk of a horn, a passing comment, texting in a movie theater. Google the words “parking space and gun” and all sorts of shootings come up.

[…]

Relatives and friends of the victims are understandably looking for something deeper behind the deaths of their loved ones. And there may well be. But it’s also possible that this was violence without any broader connection, another case of anger, frustration and stress all terribly magnified by a gun.

It’s a haunting idea that we’ve become so inured to gun violence that it must be tied to a larger context to have meaning. Otherwise, it’s just something that happens, like a car accident. No one seems particularly alarmed that Hicks was found to have a dozen firearms in his condominium, including a fully loaded AR-15 Bushmaster, the same military-style rifle used in the Newtown massacre. Maybe if we believe the Chapel Hill shootings involved some sharply focused hatred, we don’t have to think of what might have happened had there been a party with 15 people in a condominium, cars double parked and an angry man at the door with an AR-15. This is America. Hicks had a right to keep and bear arms, to stockpile arms, to arm himself with rifles designed for combat.

The Bushmaster rifle in question is semi-automatic.  Folks in combat tend to prefer fully-automatic weapons. You COULD say all guns are designed for combat.  After all, at one point in history, combat was undertaken with slingshots and rocks. Would Ned consider those rocks in my back yard “designed for combat”?  kept-whores-gun-bias

He apparently owned the weapons legally. Sane gun laws might prevent the assemblage of these social time bombs. People should be allowed to have guns only when they can establish a need for them – hunting or protection – not just a desire for them. Somehow guns have become intertwined with freedom.

IT might have something to do with that lil’ ol’ Second Amendment thingie in the Constitution.

What they really are about is annihilation. So few need a gun, yet so many have them. Someday that imbalance will be fixed, but it will be a long time coming.

Bring on that fascist dictatorship, huh, Ned?  #doofus.   #SMH

Chapel Hill Mayor Mark Kleinschmidt is active in the national group Mayors Against Illegal Guns. He said, “If we had reasonable gun laws it might not have prevented this incident, but it might make such events less common around the country. But there’s not political will to do that.”

No, there’s not. The slaughter of innocents in Chapel Hill won’t change that any more than the Newtown slaughter of children did. Indeed, the North Carolina General Assembly in 2013 expanded the places where gun owners can take concealed handguns, though lawmakers kept legislative buildings off limits..

“Reasonable gun laws” ????  It’s harder to buy a gun than it is to get an abortion.  And possessing a gun is specifically mentioned in The Constitution !!!  

Just like with Newtown, there was no indication that the culprit was capable of this –prior to the incident.  What it really casts a light on is the plight of handling the mentally ill in America.  Liberal activists — many based in the People’s Republic of Chapel Hill — have sued to remove mentally ill people from institutions and to make it harder to drive_by_media1institutionalize them.  Thanks to this meddling, we’ve got an awful lot of people who cannot function unsupervised in free society, or should not be roaming unsupervised out in public.

It will be a while before it becomes clear why three smart, promising and altruistic young people were shot to death in Chapel Hill. But we know the means and the context that killed them: guns, readily obtained, readily tolerated, readily involved in mayhem.

All lives matter. What doesn’t seem to matter is the easy availability of guns designed to do nothing but take lives.

Just like with cars, the most important factor is who is controlling the mechanism.  A gun-packing hoodlum perpetrating a home invasion is one thing.  The homeowner blowing said hoodlum’s head off with the same caliber weapon is another.  Guns also serve to protect the innocent and their property.  They are also great equalizers — giving fair notice to the powerful that their power, if it overreaches, can be checked. 

3 thoughts on “‘The hard toll of easy guns’

  1. Hicks is a progressive politically, and an atheist who hared all religions. He is also an adherent of the leftwing hate group Southern Poverty Law Center. A stalwart of the Southern Poverty Law Center a few years ago took a gun to attack the office of a major national Christian activist organization, egged on by the hate speech on the SPLC site toward that group, and killed a security guard before he was disarmed.

    Guns are inanimate objects which do nothing on their own. I think it is clear here that those who are dangerous are adherents of the Southern Poverty Law Center, progressives, and atheists. If anyone is to be disarmed, they are the ones.

    The N&O here is channelling Adolf Hitler and acting like Josef Goebbels in propagandizing for the disarmament of the people. It makes it easier for an authoritarian government to suppress freedom when the public is disarmed. That is why Hitler disarmed the German people and it is why the extreme left in the US wishes to disarm the American people. I’ll bet Germany’s Jewish residents really wished they still had their guns when the SS came for them.

    1. Hicks had a very mixed up list of things he was attracted to, Left AND Right. One thing for sure though, he loved his Conceal/Carry permit.

Comments are closed.