Renee Ellmers for, um ….. SENATE ??????

ellmers1

 

 

 

As one of the lucky souls blessed to be “represented” by Miss Harnett County, I’ve had a feeling she’s developed some political ambitions.  It’s been pretty clear that SOMETHING is up.

Since Christmas, we’ve been getting a lot of scripture and God-talk from our fearless leader.  She’s told the press that she’s “praying” about running for Senate.   Ellmers has been quite scarce around the Second District, but has been showing up for speaking engagements at all kinds of places well outside the district.

Just this week, she was an invited speaker at a meeting of the Mecklenburg Young Republicans.  A source at the meeting tells me she sang the praises of the “marketplace fairness act” that she co-sponsored (which gives government more access to e-business revenues). It was also made explicitly clear that recording her remarks was verboten.  (A local blogger was on-site, attempting to film her speech, and was shut down.) 

Let’s see how well that works in a statewide campaign against Kay Hagan.

Renee’s team appear to really be trying to shelter her from tough questions. Take her “tele-town hall” strategy, for instance.   If you live in the district, you get randomly called (typically during the dinner hour).  That helps to catch people off guard so they won’t have time to prepare questions.  Caller ID for these tele-town halls makes many think it’s a telemarketer, so a lot of these calls are likely ignored.  The total population who might participate is dramatically reduced.  Renee gets to read from a script and receive aid from staffers in the room with her.  It’s patty-cake.  Much easier than trying to operate in a room full of ticked-off voters angry about — oh, debt ceiling increases, tax increases, out of control spending, support for gay marriage, and expanding governmental power. 

It’s a smart strategy to try to unseat a female incumbent with another woman.  (See then-up and coming star state Rep. Mia Morris (R) vs. Margaret Dickson (D) in 2004, and Elizabeth Dole v. Kay Hagan in 2008.) 

Though, if we do get a Hagan-Ellmers race, how do you honestly differentiate between the two candidates?  Hagan has come out in favor of gay marriage.  Ellmers opposed the marriage amendment to the state constitution.  Hagan has been a reliable vote for the Democrat tax-and-spend agenda.  But Ellmers has voted to raise the debt ceiling and allow the Bush tax rates to expire.  She’s voted to authorize the Ex-Im Bank, which is little more than corporate welfare for huge multi-nationals.  There’s not a whole lot of difference there.  You’re basically trading someone with a D next to her name with someone who will have an R next to her name.  

Renee’s campaign likes to tout a ranking from National Journal, an establishment political magazine, that says she’s one of the more conservative members of the House.   The problem?  National Journal considers you conservative IF you vote how Eric Cantor and John Boehner want you to vote.   Those two House GOP leaders haven’t exactly been conservative profiles in courage.

 

3 thoughts on “Renee Ellmers for, um ….. SENATE ??????

  1. While I agree on some counts regarding our Representative, specifically the debt votes, your attack on tele-town hall is not entirely founded. Having worked on campaigns in several states I know the difficulty in getting people to regular town halls/public forums. The participation rate of people who are called and asked to join a phone conversation are much higher than when invited to attend an event. You also reach people outside your normal circle of contact. All in all tele-town halls are an effective and economical way to reach a large swath of a constituency at once.

    That said teleconference townhalls should be used to supplement, not replace, face to face meetings. That was why I was please to hear Ellmers would be attending the Moore County Republican Convention. Hope you are able to make it out as well.

  2. The good thing about Rippon Society member Renee Ellmers running for Senate is that then there will be two liberal Republicans, her and Tillis to split the establishment vote. That will give a real conservative a good chance.

    1. Several ways to look at that. The more pessimistic is that the rank and file too often assume that Republican is more or less synonymous with Conservative and will not look at Tillis and Ellmers the way you or I do. That is why we’re cursed with Richard Burr, who talked a good conservative game just before his re-election. Having said that, a few additional thoughts. First, I have no idea how much Ellmers has impressed folks in the new 2nd district but she won’t be remembered fondly in several counties of the old 2nd district, that I know about. As for Tillis, he is trying to get his edge to by sucking up to the County Chairmen with scheduled teleconferences every other month or so. Giving either of these two a six year term is a big mistake.

Comments are closed.