#ncpol: Like grandpa, like grandson.

If you’ve ever wondered HOW Dallas Woodhouse comes up with some of the things he says and does, look no further than his grandfather, NCGOP chairman Robin Hayes:

The chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party faces criticism for comments he made at a recent campaign fundraiser, where some say he misrepresented campaign finance laws and possibly forecast his intentions to break them.

Robin Hayes, chairman of the NC GOP, spoke at the fundraiser for U.S. Rep. David Rouzer at the Figure 8 Yacht Club in Wilmington on Aug. 10 when he asked attendees to donate to the party organization to help Rouzer. A Democrat who attended the fundraiser recorded part of Hayes’ speech and gave it to The News & Observer.[...]

A Democrat gave it to The N&O?  *As my friend Gomer says: ‘Sir-prize, Sir-prize,Sir-prize!’*

Dallas and Robin are an absolute goldmine for Democrat opposition research types.  I have a feeling THIS is just the tip of the iceberg.


[…] “This is an envelope. You have heard things that should inspire you to dig deep tonight. But federal law says you can only give, you and your wife, $5,200 to David Rouzer,” Hayes says in the recording. Rouzer then corrects him to say the individual federal spending limit is $5,400 per year. […] 

*It’s just awe-inspiring to watch a master fundraiser at work.*


[…] “But you can take this envelope, put money in here and give it to your friend and citizen, Robin Hayes, who happens to be party chair and I can take unlimited money and put it to his campaign, legally,” Hayes said.[…]

*Ruh-roh.* (Paging Mr. Stark. Mr. Tom Stark …)


[…] Hayes’ comments raise questions about his plans for the money and whether he intentionally misled potential donors.

Federal campaign finance laws prohibit state organizations from earmarking general donations for specific candidates and do, in fact, limit the amount of money that individuals can donate to the state party. Party organizations are also limited to $5,000 per candidate per election.

So Hayes’ comment about taking unlimited money is inaccurate, says Daniel Weiner, senior counsel to the Brennan Center for Justice’s democracy program.

“First of all, Hayes cannot take unlimited money to spend on federal elections,” Weiner said in an phone interview, referring to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, also known as the McCain-Feingold Act.

“His statement is not an accurate reflection of the law,” he said. “You can’t just raise unlimited funds for federal elections if you’re a party chair. That’s pretty basic. They’re also prohibited from soliciting unlimited funds.”[…]

Hoo-boy.  Wait.  Wasn’t this supposed to “HELP” David Rouzer?

Never fear, folks.  Robin’s grandson Dallas was close by ready to pull grandpa’s chestnuts out of the fire:

[…] Dallas Woodhouse, the NC GOP executive director, responded by email to an inquiry from The N&O. Woodhouse said the party strictly follows all campaign laws and doesn’t accept “directed” contributions to its campaign committees for federal or state campaigns.[…]

Well, WHAT was grandpa talking about then?

[…] But Hayes wasn’t soliciting funds for either of those committees, Woodhouse said. Hayes was asking for donations to a campaign committee that doesn’t exist yet, according to Woodhouse.[…]

Hmmm.  Kinda reminds me of the words of the great philosopher Wimpy, who once said: ‘I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.’


[…] “Chairman Hayes was soliciting funds for a yet to be created Federal Joint Fundraising account. We can solicit for that for our work in (Rouzer’s) race in coordination with him,” Woodhouse wrote.

“While we are limited to $5,000 in direct candidate support, the party may spend unlimited funds collected under the limits from its (joint committee) on a Congressional Race. The funds would not be sent directly to the candidate,” the Woodhouse email says.

Woodhouse is right about how the funds in a joint fundraising account could be used, according to David Kolker, counsel for the Campaign Legal Center, a nonprofit that promotes transparent government and fair campaign practices.

However, the GOP likely erred by soliciting funds for a joint fundraising committee that hasn’t been created with the U.S. Federal Election Commission, Kolker said in a phone interview.

“You have to set it all up ahead of time. They have to create a committee, register it with the FEC and say how they’ll divvy (the money) up,” Kolker said, referring to FEC regulations.

Woodhouse, for his part, suggested no violation had taken place because — despite Hayes’ request for money at Rouzer’s event — he didn’t raise any money for the yet-to-be-created joint committee.

“No funds on that project have been received, and we don’t open the account until we have pledges to those accounts. Mr. Hayes received no funds at that event,” Woodhouse said in an email.

Woodhouse’s explanation aside, Kolker said he interpreted Hayes’ comments “to mean he’s going to coordinate with the campaign when he spends it, and that’s a huge red flag. Not a dime can be used for that purpose.”

He suspects the GOP, with its explanation, is “sloppily trying to reinvent history to comply with the law.”[…]

Gee. I wonder how the FEC feels about all this:

[…] Whether or not the FEC, which enforces election laws, would come down on Hayes or the NC GOP is unclear and experts say unlikely.

The FEC “cannot comment on the activity of specific candidates or committees or speculate on the legality of any specific or potential set of circumstances,” spokeswoman Judith Ingram told The N&O in an email.

On whether Hayes acted inappropriately by soliciting funds for a joint committee that doesn’t exist, she referred the N&O to regulations that say: “Before conducting a joint fundraiser, all participants must enter into a written agreement that identifies the fundraising representative and states the allocation formula — the percentages or amounts used to allocate joint fundraising proceeds and expenses among participants. The fundraising representative must retain a copy of the written agreement for three years and make it available to the FEC upon request.”[…]

Brace yourselves for ANOTHER shocker:

[…] The NC Democratic Party is likely to file a complaint, according to spokesman Robert Howard.

“These comments clearly show that the Republican Party is earmarking funds for specific candidates, a serious violation that should be fully investigated,” Howard said in an email.

“Facing a groundswell of voters frustrated by Republican efforts to undermine protections for pre-existing conditions and to rig our economy at the expense of working families, Republicans are resorting to breaking election law to get their wealthy donors to save them,” he continued. “It won’t work.”[…]

10 thoughts on “#ncpol: Like grandpa, like grandson.

  1. Woodhouse caused a complaint against Carolina Rising when he ran it by stupid statements to the media. It looks like he and Robin may do the same for the NCGOP. And Stark will probably fatten his pocket with legal fees as a result. Why does the NCGOP hire / elect people like that?

  2. Considering the Supreme Court debacles of 2016 and 2018 and the above story, whose side are these jokers on anyway? Is Dallas helping his Democrat-party activist brother, Brad Woodhouse, sabotage Republicans in NC or is this just total incompetence? The Raleigh braintrust needs a lobotomy.

  3. Sheer incompetence. The Central Committee members must be so proud of this dynamic duo. As for the rank and file, we’re just disgusted and embarrassed, once again.

  4. Wonder what David Rouzer has to say about this incompetence? This is just another example of the idiocy of the dynamic duo of Woodhouse/Hayes. Wonder why Dallas hasn’t commented on this piece yet? He’s always quick to defend himself on here.

  5. Here is a video of Woodhouse drunkenly blabbing information that included violation of campaign finance laws to a reporter which led to a formal complaint to the Federal Election Commission and Woodhouse and his organization narrowly staved off a formal invesitgation on a tie vote:


    Since this happened BEFORE he was hired at NCGOP, one wonders why he is ever allowed to talk to the media, and why he was hired in the first place.

    This is not the first similar rodeo for Woodhouse.

    1. well they had a great debate on who to hire in the central committee meeting while a excom meeting was happening at the same time…. the central committee should have sought out the wisdom of the excom in making the choice but the bigger goal at the time how to oust the convention elected chairman and hiring someone the chairman did not want was one of the first steps in doing this I see great parallels in how people are trying to get impeach Trump in the ousting of the convention elected NCGOP chairman at that time

      1. The state executive committee needs to take the initiative to jerk a kink in the neck of the central committee. Of course they’ll have to get their own house in order first.

  6. These Democrat media sources do not bother with the big fish. There is an FEC complaint against Hillary Clinton for $84 million in money laundering through state based joint fundraising committees.


    Many state Democrat parties were involved, and North Carolina was likely one of them. You won’t read that in the biased liberal media, however.

Comments are closed.