#NCGA: Solar STILL lives ?????

saine2If ONLY some of these honorables would go to the mat for us as hard as they do for their cronies and bundlers.  The word on the street — Jones Street, specifically — that state rep. Jason Saine (R-Tom James Co.) has sneaked (snucked? sneakered? snookered?) a provision restoring solar subsidies into a FARM BILL moving through the House today.

Here’s the documentation to give you an idea of WHO in each chamber is guiding this shenanigan:

You are hereby notified that the House Committee on Finance will meet  as follows:

DAY & DATE:   Wednesday, September 23, 2015

TIME:                  12:00 PM

LOCATION:       544 LOB

COMMENTS:     Senior Chairman Jason Saine, presiding.

The following bills will be considered:

BILL NO.

SHORT TITLE

SPONSOR

SB 605

Various Changes to the Revenue Laws.

Senator Rucho

Senator Rabon

Senator Tillman

SB 513

North Carolina Farm Act of 2015.

Senator Brock

Senator B. Jackson

Respectfully,
Representative William Brawley, Senior Co-ChairCMOGh5VVEAAoghr
Representative Jason Saine, Senior Co-Chair

 

Representative Kelly E. Hastings, Co-Chair
Representative Susan Martin, Co-Chair
Representative Mitchell S. Setzer, Co-Chair
Representative John Szoka, Co-Chair

Wow.  *Plenty of notice, there.*

The folks at AFP are NOT AMUSED: 

From: Donald Bryson <DBryson@afphq.org>
Subject: Farm Bill – “energy study”
Date: September 23, 2015 10:30:40 AM EDT

 

Members of the NC House Finance Committee:
I hope this email finds you well, as the weather is cooling off and autumn moves into North Carolina.
Today, at 2pm, you will consider Senate Bill 513 – North Carolina Farm Act of 2015. Yesterday, in the House Rules Committee and study provision was added to “ESTABLISH THE RENEWABLE ENERGY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STUDY COMMITTEE TO STUDY RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICIES IN NORTH CAROLINA.”
To speak candidly, this is a bad study. It is specifically slanted to conclude with a finding that refundable tax credits and mandates for buying green energy will spur economic development. From the parameters to the study, to who is designated for the committee, this study is built to reach one conclusion.  And with 27 lobbyists at the General Assembly representing one solar energy company or another, it’s no surprise that this was snuck in.ncleg
 
I’m urging you to either defeat the bill outright or strip this study provision. If there is to be a study then I submit that it should be:
a)      Conducted by the Energy Policy Council;
b)      Conducted to study the energy grid in such a way that conclusions are reached to find what is least-cost for ratepayers; and
c)      Model language for a reasoned study can be found in House Bill 681 (Part VII; pg. 5).
A study that is set up to find one conclusion is not a true study.  A “stakeholder study” that does not include ratepayers is a study missing the biggest stakeholder of all.
Furthermore, Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ; formerly DENR) published a report in March of this year. That report show an adverse economic impact due to  North Carolina’s renewable energy investments.
That report says:

·         “North Carolina remains the only state in the Southeast to have enacted a REPS. As a result of this geographic isolation, long term energy prices may adversely impact economic growth and challenge recent improvements in employment in North Carolina.” (page 3)madguy

·         A La Capra study noted, “At higher rate impact levels, the job losses from higher total cost of electricity across the state may exceed the jobs gained through renewables development.” (page 15)

·         Although residential customers in North  Carolina pay less than the South Atlantic and national average for electricity, (6 percent and 12 percent lower, respectively), their rates have increased 20 percent since 2008 to 11.4 cents per kWh (July 2014). During this same period, the average residential electric rates in the South Atlantic and the U.S. rose 14 percent and 15 percent, respectively. The cost of energy efficiency, demand side management and renewable energy programs are passed onto the customer in the form of a rider and account for about 2 percent to 4 percent of average monthly power bill served by investor owned utilities. (page 26)

 

Thank you for your time and consideration.mad as hell

Donald Bryson | State Director – North Carolina | Americans for Prosperity
m: 919.710.0484 | e: DBryson@afphq.org | @donaldbryson

I swear. You can’t take your eyes off these people for 30 seconds. Some good news? Sources tell me this legislation was in trouble before this sneakiness was perpetrated.  Things should get interesting over there on Jones Street.

Get Mad.   (We’re Mad.) Get on ’em and STAY ON ‘EM.  This needs to die.  

8 thoughts on “#NCGA: Solar STILL lives ?????

  1. Just wrote my Senator Buck Newton in opposition to SB513 specifically Sec 21(a) Renewable Energy Economic Development Study Committee. What a crock, not to mention some other items in this “Farm Bill”. The entire bill needs to be rejected. Why do we need to a committee whose foregone conclusion will be to keep funneling our income to the solar and wind industries in the form of tax payer funded subsidies. The study is already in: without subsidy the industry can’t produce profits or save the consumer money. It’s time to end the direct subsidy of this industry. Reduced taxes that the State didn’t have to start with is one thing…direct subsidy is another. They lobby will claim it’s just tax credits for taxes the state would not have anyway but the reality is much different. Consumers are being hit through their utility bills for the costs. It’s time to let the market support or kill these businesses. I’m in business but don’t get subsidies or tax credits. How is that fair. Can’t believe Senator Brock is a sponsor of this horses&#t!

  2. Saine is insane. He and Brawley badly need primaries. They are both functional Democrats. Lets send Saine back to the unemployment line, which is where he came from when he was appointed to the House.

  3. This is Bush league. There’s not been an amendment ran or a PCS attach. No facts just Donald Bryson’s opinion

    1. Did you miss the part where he referenced the DENR study? And the PCS is online now and bears out what he’s talking about.

Comments are closed.