Hartsell is currently under investigation by the state board of elections. The senator is alleged to have been using his senate campaign fund as a slush fund to pay off personal expenses like credit cards. A special prosecutor will have the final say on the matter.
In 2012, Hartsell was unopposed in the primary and general elections. In the fourth quarter of 2012, his campaign reported debts to the Senate Republican Fund totalling $10,000 and to himself of $1,032.59.
In his campaign’s mid-year 2013 report, Hartsell’s campaign reported debts totaling $57,698.36. That’s quite a jump from six months earlier. (And 2013 was NOT an election year.) The campaign reported owing: the candidate himself $27,247.86 ; attorney Roger Knight $17,550.50 ; The Senate Republican Fund $10,000 ; and $2,900.00 to a Raleigh accounting firm.
On the year end 2013 report, the campaign’s debt to outsiders had ballooned to $135,578.78. Of that amount, the campaign reported owing $91,969.78 to Hartsell, himself. Hartsell’s attorney, Knight, was reportedly owed $18,609. The debt to the Republican Senate Fund had grown to $20,000. And the debt to the Raleigh CPA was at $5000.
On the First Quarter (April) 2014 report, the campaign’s debt had grown to $144,192.78. Of that amount, it reported owing $100,583.78 to Hartsell himself. All other debts were at the same amount they were in the year end 2013 report.
In May 2014, Hartsell easily disposed of an underfunded Tea Party primary challenger.
Let’s go to year-end 2014. That report indicates a total campaign debt of $204,829.69. The November general election campaign had already taken place. Hartsell had no general election opponent.
The year-end report indicates $169,829.69 of that campaign debt was owed to Hartsell himself. Knight, the attorney, was owed $10,000 and the Senate Republican Fund was owed $20,000. Capitol Communications — owned and operated by uber consultant Paul Shumaker — was listed as being owed $5000 by the campaign.
Why was this campaign debt being incurred? (A token primary opponent. No general election opponent.) Why was this money being transferred around? What was the campaign money being spent on?