When liberals and the drivebys and other establishment types start throwing the word “civility” at you, it means: “Shut up and keep letting us run things, even though the voters killed us at the polls and put you in charge.”
The same people sermonizing about “civility” are those who don’t hesitate to mock the suicide of a political foe’s child, or blame a Muslim terrorist’s mass murder on good church-going Christians.
*Surprise, surprise.* Here in the eighth year of Republican rule in Raleigh, they’ve got some kind of formal civility conference all set up. They invited Rob Christensen. And they even found at least ONE useful idiot to make the whole thing bipartisan:
For the past year, some of North Carolina’s leading Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, left-wingers and right-wingers, tried something different.
They talked to each other. And I don’t mean they trolled each other on the internet, calling each other pinkos or knuckle-draggers.
Ah, “civil” conversations. In other words, arrogant pinky-in-the-air liberals snidely lectured right-leaning folks who meekly tucked their tails and offered up on command a torrent of “Yes’m”, “No’m” and “We’ll do better”s.
Our founders thought it was important to institute a system where it was hard to get things done, and there would be lots and lots of spirited debate. Places like Venezuela and Cuba and China and Iran have governments where everybody is on the same page, and there is nooooooooo debate. MORE:
[…] Those who were listed as participants included Raleigh businessman Art Pope, a financial backer of Republican candidates; state GOP Chairman Robin Hayes; former GOP gubernatorial candidate Chuck Neely; the AFL-CIO’s MaryBe McMillan; former Charlotte Mayor Dan Clodfelter, a Democrat, and former Democratic state Rep. Rick Glazier, who leads the N.C. Justice Center.
And while they didn’t convince each other to change their political philosophies, participants said it was a useful exercise in better understanding the other person’s point of view.
“We felt it was really important for the future of the state for people who honestly disagree with each other, have a place where we could listen to each other’s opinions… and perhaps form some relationships,” said former state Sen. Leslie Winner.
*Like these people don’t see each other every night, or every other night, on the Raleigh cocktail party circuit.* MORE:
The North Carolina Leadership Forum was the idea of two people – Winner, the former head of the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation in Winston-Salem, and John Hood, the president of the John William Pope Foundation in Raleigh. It was prompted by a Hood column.
Winner is a liberal and Hood is a conservative. They both agreed that there was not enough conversation among people with different political views and that they should make some effort to cross the partisan divide.
So, promoting principles and specific ideas is not all that important? So, what exactly is that John Locke Foundation all about, then? MORE:
There was no playbook on how to do this, Winner said. The sessions were private and off the record – they did not involve any governmental body – so that people could speak candidly.
Hood said there were several traps they tried to avoid: not to pay too much attention to the past, both good and bad, and to avoid coming up with any sort of 10-point plan to solve a particular problem.
The aim, Hood said, “was to have a civil dialogue about persistent and even unbridgeable differences, as opposed to a dialogue that leads to consensus, which is easier.”
Fritz Mayer, who headed the Duke project, called it a “fascinating exercise” and said Duke had funding to bring in another group of North Carolina leaders in the fall.
Per-FECT!!!! Let’s disband the General Assembly, lock all of these really *smart* people from inside the Raleigh beltline into a room, and NOT let them out until EVERYTHING is fixed. (*And we MEAN everything.*)
[…] Hood said this project alone can’t dramatically improve things in the state. But he said participants hoped that similar projects will be replicated in communities across the state.
“It is contrary to human nature to attack people … if you know people personally,” Hood said. “It is not that you are going to agree on everything. It is just that you are not going to make all of your disagreements personal.”
Hood recalled the old “Firing Line” TV program hosted by conservative William Buckley, where he engaged politely with liberals such as John Kenneth Galbraith.
“It really was the case in the not too distant past where people could disagree very strongly with each other on important issues and not call each other names,” Hood said. “I think we had some of that in our first session. We argued with each other, instead of bickering with one another.”
I guess Hood missed that televised debate where Buckley called Gore Vidal, an actual licensed and practicing homosexual, a “queer” and threatened to punch him in the face. (*Civility, anyone?*)