Must-Watch TV
One of the most important things you could do this month would be to watch The EpochTimes’s The Real Story of Jan.6.(It’s streamed free throughout September.)
It will make you mad as hell. It will also throw a scare into you regarding where we are as a country and where we are going.
The video contains some fascinating video footage from that day that I haven’t seen anywhere else. Some takeaways:
- It appears that some of the Capitol Police were agitating the demonstrators into a violent frenzy by deploying fire hoses, pepper spray and concussion grenades against them. Some demonstrators were actually set on fire by the grenades. Initially, the “dangerous” crowd was doing scary things like singing “Amazing Grace.”
- Apparently, four Trump supporters died that day. No cops or other security people did. Where has that been reported in the drive-by media?
- One of the women who died was, first, seriously injured by being trampled by the crowd scuffling with police. Video shows, as she laid unconscious on the ground, a black female officer hit her several times with a baton. The woman was white. The officer was black and female. So, there was no George Floyd-like frenzy.
- Up to 20 “suspicious actors” are identified on video. Every time trouble broke out, at least two of these “actors” were in close proximity to it. Several of them had that law-enforcement bearing / demeanor — even while wearing plain-clothes and MAGA hats. Some of these “actors” were seen running away from the Capitol to about a mile away where Trump had spoken. They were reportedly encouraging Trump supporters there to head over to the Capitol. None of the 20 have ever been identified by name or charged.
- One young demonstrator, who attempted to calm down his fellow demonstrators, got hit with four federal felonies and jailed days after the event. The young man, overwhelmed by his first criminal charges and the expected legal bill, took his own life.
- Video also showed an unarmed female demonstrator being repeatedly slammed and bounced around against a block wall by shield-wielding armed cops.
- A renowned police use-of-force expert said on video that the cops did not utilize standard training for dispersing a crowd. He said they appeared to be “punishing” the demonstrators rather than attempting to dispersing them.
- The OathKeepers –currently being tried by the DOJ — are shown on the video aiding police in the effort to calm the situation. One video segment showed OathKeepers escorting officers to safety and out of The Capitol through the crowd. One female demonstrator was shown hugging each officer as they passed her.
This video flies in the face of everything we have been sold about the events of January 6, 2021. It was a travesty and a tragedy. There were a number of people wearing badges who really need to explain themselves.
Verify everything the government and the drive-by media tries to sell you. What I saw on the video looked more like news footage from Latin American dictatorships and former European communist dictatorships. The police present that day deserve a lot of heat and a lot of questions.
People are sitting in jail, in solitary confinement, for the heinous crime of standing near the exterior of The Capitol. Many of them have no firm charges, hearing dates, or trial dates.
This is not America.
Watch the video. Share it with everyone you know and care about.
The corruption at the federal level is staggering. Brought to you by the Left and it’s puppet J R Biden.
The far left and far right minorities are the reason the fabric of this country is being ripped apart. To use the extreme Epoch Times as a news source seriously damages the credibility you have established on other issues. What’s next a QAnon update when you let us know when JFK Jr. is coming back to life to run for office? Can’t be taken seriously overall if you post this type of garbage.
” To use the extreme Epoch Times ” totally laughable and what happens to be your favorite news source CNN or MSNBC do you still wear a mask in public and I guess also probably also in your car and house alone
Speaking of taking people seriously and the nutty extremism of isolated people wearing masks in terror: I recently saw someone alone walking on the beach with a mask on. Gavin Newsom (the California governor) would be so pleased seeing North Carolinian peasants so terrified.
Not exactly, I’m in the middle wondering why extremists have taken over the narrative of this country.
based on your post it seems like you could easily be the extremist you are complaining about ??? prove you are not ??? also what is a extremist ???
You don’t get it. The self-styled “mainstream media” also called the legacy media, alphabet media, drive-by media, leftstream media, or simply the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party, are the biased news sources, and the polls show that most Americans have figured that out. Thank God much of the British media still do real journalism that tells both sides, many of them cover America and we can read it on the internet.
Thank you for that deeply researched insight. I’m sure your “polls” are completely unbiased and you have a keen understanding of the voting population. Conspiracy theorists like you need a hobby or to get laid. Probably both.
Try this year’s Gallup poll on trust in American institutions which showed trust in the American news media the lowest on record. Only 16% of Americans have a great deal of trust or quite a lot of confidence in newspapers. Only 11% had any level of confidence in television news.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/394817/media-confidence-ratings-record-lows.aspx
Having had too-close an observation of a similar event, the so-called Twitter Revolution in Moldova in 2009, that tracked the Jan. 6 riots in Washington, DC, it is clear that both involved outside instigators and deliberate provocation.
At the time I was running a program to advise and train the pro-western political parties in Moldova. The Communists had just won reelection in an election in which there were allegations of fraud. A prominent journalist who had a reputation of opposing communism, working with students organized a demonstration against the elections the evening after the results were announced. It was advertised on Twitter, hence the name “Twitter Revolution”. That demonstration in the boulevard between the Presidency and the Parliament was peaceful, with students holding lighted candles, often with signs like “Good-bye, Moldova”. Leaders of the pro-western parties made speeches to the student protesters. The organizers asked students to return the next morning to continue the protest. An even larger crowd came out then.
The morning of the next day seemed to be peaceful. My office was three blocks from the site of the demonstration. I had lunch with the head of a diplomatic delegation at a Greek restaurant two blocks from the demonstration and coming out of the restaurant, the noise level had increased tremendously from when we had entered. When I got back to my office, my Moldovan staff were clustered around the TV and demonstrators on the screen were in the process of seizing a water cannon truck away from the police. Then they forced their way into the Presidency. I closed the office and sent my staff home telling them to give the demonstration a very wide berth.
I turned on the TV at home and watched the crowd ransack the lower floors of the Presidency, hauling furniture and computers out into the street and breaking them. The announcer mentioned that the Communist president was with his staff and his security in the building on an upper floor while this was happening. Later, the TV showed the crowd break into the Parliament building and ransack it. One wing was set on fire.
The Communists were quick to blame the four major pro-western parties for this riot, and quickly got out a “documentary” entitled “Attack on Moldova” which they ran on the government channel, Moldova Uno, repeatedly. It interspersed party leaders addressing the peaceful crowd on the first evening with the mob ransacking the government buildings the next day.
The communist blame game, however, started to unravel. The first thing that didn’t pass muster involved the raising of Romanian flags on both the Presidency and the Parliament. It was quickly pointed out that to get to the rooftop flagpole on the Presidency, it was necessary to be let through the heavy security measures on the floor where the president’s actual office was located. In other words, the Communist president had to have allowed that to have been done, and their excuses for it were lame. Then a photo with a telephoto lens of the raising of the Romanian flag on roof of the Parliament building emerged. Two people were engaged in that, one in profile in a police uniform and a very distinctive oversized police hat. The other person was facing the camera, but it took a while to identify him. It turned out he was a Communist youth agitator who had been photographed at multiple communist demonstrations against the pro-western parties. When his name was uncovered, it was further learned that his father held a government position under the Communists.
In studying lots of videos from cell phones of the period the demonstration turned violent, it was observed that around twenty individuals with big canvas sacks of rocks had suddenly appeared, and started exchanging hand signals. They all moved in a coordinated fashion to the front of the demonstration and used the rocks from their bags to break out the big glass windows on the front of the Presidency, charging inside and calling on the crowd to follow. As often happens in such situations, mob mentality took over and some from the crowd joined in. The instigators then melted away
The instigators later reformed to also lead the attack on the Parliament building, also fading away after they got the crowd engaged. Still shots of each of the instigators were later passed around among party activists to try to identify them. Only when parties sent photos around to their rural branches did names start to be put with faces. Many were identified as Communist activists from rural parts of the country, but some remained mysteries. A tip from a disgusted policemen led to identification of most of the rest. He had been in front of the Presidency when it was attacked and was shocked to see a criminal that he had himself arrested the previous evening and who should have been in jail, as one of the instigators with a canvas sack of rocks. Others were then identified as criminals who should have been in jail at the time instead of in front of the Presidency.
The pro-western parties had no access to national TV so they made their own videos telling what really happened in the Twitter Revolution, and held many events around the country to show those videos. Moldova got a new election a few months later, and when we did a poll in the run up to that new election, our poll numbers showed that most people in the country, even including a majority of the Communist voters, did not believe the pro-western parties were responsible for the Twitter Revolution. The pro-western parties defeated the Communists in the second 2009 election, and Mihai Ghimpu of the Liberal Party became the new president with a pro-western majority in Parliament.
After most of the background had been discovered, one late emerging fact also shed light on the Twitter Revolution. The journalist involved in organizing the anti-communist demonstrations turned out to have been secretly dating the chief advisor to the Communist president at the time she did it. That advisor came from the most stridently Marxist wing of the party.
If one really delves into what happened on January 6, there is little doubt in my mind that something like the Twitter Revolution in Moldova was at play. The key is to identify the instigators, and Pelosi’s committee is not about to do that any more than the Communists in Moldova would.