Busybodies and other people’s property

Moore County is yellow-dog Republican.  But we have plenty of folks who like to dictate what other people do with their property.  It’s one thing to oppose something over noise issues, environmental issues, or safety concerns.  It’s another to oppose development because you’re trying to kill off competition for your business, or that you just have a bone to pick with capitalism.

Here, we like to have public hearings over the installation of swing sets and fences.  We have people who build houses on land adjacent to commercially-zoned property, and then raise holy hell when someone comes along and wants to put a business on that properly-zoned piece of property.

The latest kerfluffle in Southern Pines involves a decision by the Bell family, which owns the Pine Needles and Mid-Pines golf resorts, to develop a parcel of property adjoining the existing golf club properties and U.S. 1.  A group of merchants in Southern Pines’s downtown shopping district have signed a petition demanding the town of Southern Pines require an economic impact study — financed by the town or the property owner — before final approval of the property’s rezoning.

My partner-in-crime in the local conservative common sense caucus, Bill Cochrane, is taking on these busybodies head-on:

[…] A source of angst for ­several merchants was an Internet post last month on the Moore TEA Citizens ­website in which Southern Pines resident Bill Cochrane identified the petitioners and said they “want to use (the) Town Council to slam the door shut on new business entrants.”

“It is not the role of government to protect the downtown merchants from competition, to shower them with crony favors, and to determine winners and losers in the marketplace,” Cochrane said. […]

Instead of talking about issues, some of the downtown merchants have decided to take potshots at Bill:

[…] Claudia Miller, owner of Morgan Miller, said she was offended by Cochrane’s “negative opinions.”

“I don’t know who he is, but does he really come downtown?” Miller said. “We have very passionate, committed business owners who love this town. He was shining a very negative light on this community.”

Genevieve Walker, owner of Acorn Bakery, said Cochrane’s comments caught her off-guard.

“I was really surprised. I did not sign the petition thinking I was making a political statement,” Walker said. “It makes me wonder if he’s ever owned a business before. If he has, why would he blacklist the people in this town who try so hard to make their businesses successful?” […]

In an interview late last week, Cochrane said that he has never owned his own business, and doesn’t care what others think.

“I think the study is unnecessary,” he said. “It’s a very transparent effort to try to delay, and hopefully kill, the project.” […]

Right on.   You elect a town council to set community standards for developers to follow.  It’s un-American and indefensible to subjectively change the rules at the last minute, and pull the rug out from under people, because you want to protect your business from the possibility of competition.

Strong health businesses led by smart entrepreneurs learn to adapt and grow in the face of competition.  They see competition as a good thing that keeps them on their toes.  It’s survival of the fittest.  Good quality businesses will survive.  There are plenty of examples around.

Hopefully, the Town of Southern Pines will dismiss this nonsense and give the Bell rezoning proposal the fair, objective treatment it deserves.

1 thought on “Busybodies and other people’s property

  1. Thank you, Brant, for a well-reasoned and well-written commentary. I can tell you that not a single one of these merchants have written with an argument against any of the principles and points which I (and the editorial board of The Pilot, by the way) made in my articles. Instead, in the best Saul Alinsky fashion, they have simply derided and insulted. Some of the emails I have received from contacts to whom they were distributed are actually quite slanderous.

    If they are not reacting in that fashion, they have tried either to change the subject or to redirect the debate such that my personal history or my “reputation” become the subject rather than their own actions and behaviors.

    I believe that bringing this discussion out before the public and exposing the mindsets and behaviors of some vocal parties in Southern Pines will bring long term good. Most folks do not wish to abuse either their Town Council nor their neighbors in this manner. Thanks for helping direct attention where it belongs!

Comments are closed.