Why even bother with electing a school board?

It’s a problem we see with so many elected or appointed, alleged “watchdog” boards. Folks who win elections — or appointments — to boards pledging to be the eyes and ears of the taxpayers eventually become rubber-stamps for the bureaucrats they’re supposed to be watching.  The VIPs can still be fawned over as “councilman” or “commissioner” at cocktail parties while leaving all of the research, discussion, and fact-finding to the government employees.  *THAT is a whole lot easier.*

I’m sure some version of this is happening in all 100 of North Carolina’s counties.  On the community college board of trustees, the various city councils and county boards of commissioners, and the board of education. 

We in Moore County thought we were making some headway against this affliction after the 2022 election.  It appeared that we had replaced a 5-2 liberal majority on our county school board with a 6-1 conservative majority.  Gone, we thought, were the days when our elected watchdogs simply blessed everything the superintendent and his army of edu-crats fed them. Surely, years of tough questions and tons of scrutiny were ahead.

Two years later, that 6-1 conservative majority has morphed into a 5-2 liberal majority under the full-control of the superintendent and a doddering, back-stabbing board chairman. You can watch a typical school board meeting and you predict how any vote is going to go.  If the superintendent expresses his support, and the doddering chairman does too, you can count on a 6-1 vote for whatever the superintendent wants.  The only scrutiny and /or tough questions that exist come from board member David Hensley — who, by the way, is on the ballot for reelection this year.  Hensley is the only one on that board keeping his commitment to the voter and taxpayers.  

If you watch a meeting, you’ll see that David Hensley is the only person on the school board who clearly understands the issues being discussed.  The rest of them appear befuddled, dazed and confused — waiting for a clue from the doddering chairman or the superintendent on how to vote. 

Here’s a good example of what I’m talking about.  At the August 12 school board meeting, the superintendent and his team were trying to push through a contract with Public Impact to consult on the implementation of something called Advanced Teaching Roles.  David Hensley spoke up — seeking to table a vote on the contract.   Hensley said he was concerned with Public Impact’s focus on DEIa variation on Marxism that focuses intensely on race and gender and alleged oppression by white males.


Hensley proposed tabling the contract for one month to give board members time to seek public input on the plan.

Superintendent Tim Locklair spoke up in defense of Public Impact — swearing that he and his team will not allow DEI to be spread as part of this program.

( This is reminiscent of what has happened at Sandhills Community College.  The college’s DEI office has undergone a name change, but still appears to be preaching the same “gospel” it did when it was called DEI. DEI foe Carol Swain – who spoke at Sandhill Classical Christian School Thursday night — said DEI is becoming more and more controversial as people learn what it is about.  She said government bodies and companies are attempting a “Trojan Horse” maneuver in response — sneaking it in looking like something harmless. )

As Hensley pitched his tabling proposal, you could see the rubber-stamps on the board itching to deliver to him another 6-1 defeat.  *Hensley BAD.  Government employees, always right.*

Board vice-chairman Shannon Davis spoke first — calling herself a DEI foe but being completely trusting of Locklair and his team to manage Public Impact and their work without allowing DEI to creep in. (Begin watching the video from the 3:15:00 mark to 3:23:00 to get a load of what low-information folks in-charge looks like.). Board member Ken Benway compares Hensley’s motion to table the contract for a month in order to seek more public input to the school system cutting all ties with Sandhills Community College.

The vote on Hensley’s motion to table failed 5-2, with board member Pauline Bruno joining Hensley on the losing side.

What started off two years ago as a tremendous opportunity  for conservative reform has collapsed into a childish vendetta by doddering Bob Levy and his low-information cabal — cheered on by the government employees at the county schools’ central office.  Jealousy aimed at the smart kid in the room is choking off what had been so promising. 

Allowing left-wing government employees to run amok and unchecked is bad for our children and even worse for our community. These people who ran for office pledging to be watchdogs, but then rolled over to show their tummies and be submissive to the superintendent and his crew, should be ashamed. They have failed in their roles as watchdogs working on behalf of their friends, families and neighbors. 

In the Levy era, things are worse in public schools government than they were at any time during the Grimesey era.  They are worse than what we voted out in 2022.   David Hensley is the only incumbent on the November ballot who deserves reelection.  He’s the only one who has done what he told the voters he would do.