When THIS fat man flatulates, Raleigh is IMPRESSED

barber1

 

 

 

It seems like WRAL has film of NAACP president William Barber every day.  They give him face time if he’s standing on the street BY HIMSELF.  They’ll cover a “press conference” that includes him and four others.  His antics over redistricting of Wake County schools did little to nothing to help poor or minority kids, but were a big cause of the chaos currently engulfing the school system.  The mainstream media likes to paint Barber and his organization as a source of unification and harmony.  But at the drop of  cheeseburger or the rip of a pair of stretched-tight 8XL pants, William Barber can get statewide publicity and stir up TONS of chaos and animosity. 

Barber’s latest “victory” involves getting the McCrory administration to order the yanking of a Confederate flag from a historical exhibit at the old State Capitol commemorating the sesquicentennial (150th anniversary) of The War Between The States.  (It’s interesting that several media outlets refer to Barber as “civil rights leaders.”  Is the AP stylebook now requiring that you pluralize references  to loudmouths who weigh in at a half-ton or more? )

Let’s see what Gov. Pat got for his trouble here.  He caved in to the demands of someone who WILL NEVER campaign for him or vote for him.  He backed down to pressure from a man who takes pleasure in making conservatives and Republicans look bad.  Gov. Pat appears to have ticked off a group of people that were likely with him in 2012, and he will NEED in 2016.    Thomas Smith, commander of the North Carolina Division of The Sons of Confederate Veterans, has tossed his two cents in on this flag fiasco:

            Governor Pat McCrory is, from all accounts, a man dedicated to helping North Carolina move ahead. However, on Friday, March 29, 2013, he made a serious mistake. At first glance, maybe ordering (through his Secretary of Cultural Resources) the removal of an historical exhibit of period flags from the historic old State Capitol might seem like a minor concern. After all, we’re not talking about the budget, roads, or schools. But the removal of that exhibit–and to be precise, removing the historic Confederate Battle Flag–because of political pressure from an individual, Rev. William Barber of the NAACP, who has never supported McCrory in anything and most likely never will, is both an error historically and politically.

The purpose of the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, and in particular its Historic Sites Division, in this exhibit, was to portray the exact way the old Capitol looked during the tragic War Between the States period (1861-1865), and to do so with balance in the context of our lived history. After all, the old Capitol is an historic site and serves as a museum; the legislature meets over in the newer Legislative Building, and only very rarely uses the 1840 Capitol building ceremonially.

  Accordingly, historical flags of the period were hung upstairs in the House chamber of the historic State Capitol as a part of an exhibit (not in Governor McCrory’s office downstairs at the far end of the building). Signage and docents were there to conduct tours and inform visitors about that painful period. As part of the sesquicentennial commemoration, the exhibit was scheduled to be there until the end of observances in 2015.

This, as explained Historic Sites director Keith Hardison, was entirely correct historically, since such flags did indeed hang in the old Capitol during the historical period. The object, very clearly, was to represent our history–ALL of our history, including some items and symbols that not everyone might approve of today and that might be painful to some.

As Hardison pointed out, the historian’s role is not to censure the past, but to portray and illustrate it as accurately as possible. On the contrary, the NAACP president, Rev. Barber, apparently sees himself as the unelected arbiter of anything and everything in our state, including real and tangible portions of our collective history that he interprets as “offensive.” He complained loudly that the Battle Flag should not be displayed in the old Capitol, even though it was part of a strictly historical display and not displayed in any political or offensive manner.  He insisted it had to go.

This is where the misguided action of the Governor’s Office, acting through Governor Pat McCrory’s Secretary of Cultural Resources, makes this issue much more than the usual complaint by Reverend Barber. The caving into political pressure by the governor and his secretary is very troubling. From a simple political consideration, Governor McCrory must know that there is absolutely no way that he can ever placate Barber politically.

  But more disturbingly, this action, for all the misplaced good intentions that Governor McCrory and his secretary may well have had, indicates that the highly contagious infection of “political correctness” and the willingness to censor our history if a pressure group shouts loud enough has reached the halls of power in Raleigh. 

Applying a litmus test to whether a portion of our history can be displayed at a state historic site, even if that portion is essential to understanding our history, is the worst kind of censorship. Such action is not worthy of our governor, certainly not of a governor who wants to represent our state, its people, and all its history.

Earlier, I applauded McCrory for just saying NO to identity politics.  But I will have to consider a retraction — considering this debacle. Rev. Round & Loud will  — to paraphrase the words of Chris Tucker in “Rush Hour”  — never, never, never, never, never ever back off the GOP or McCrory.   Barber and his small group of lefties will take this victory and continue to swing away at the next opportunity to embarrass the state’s new Republican chief executive.

This could have been a GREAT “Sister Souljah” moment for Team McCrory, where they could have told the Round Rev to shove it, and shored up their already weary and dispirited right flank.  But, no. They chose a quick and dirty surrender that boosted the morale and enthusiasm of the, um, loyal opposition.  Let’s say Barber denounces every forthcoming GOP policy initiative as “racist” or “insensitive.”  Will Team McCrory stick with this “cave” strategy?  If they do, what was the point of voting for them in 2012?  What will be the point of voting to reelect Gov. Pat in 2016?

 

11 thoughts on “When THIS fat man flatulates, Raleigh is IMPRESSED

  1. This fat tub of lard and historically ignorant ass wipe is insulting my ancestors, who fought to defend their homes against invaision. It is shameful that the Governor caved in. He needs to grow a backbone. Comrade Barber is nothing but a worthless rabble rouser and trouble maker, who would probably be happier if he were in North Korea. Lets chip in and buy him a plane ticket, err, make that enough plane tickets for a whole row of seats.

  2. McCrory has angered a lot of folks who care about NC history and heritage. He has no backbone and has lost many of his most loyal supporters for good. Sadly, both McCrory and Barber have played the race card on this one. Shame on them both. They deserve each other. And we thought McCrory was going to be a new kind of leader. What a joke!

  3. I disapprove of Rev. Barber as much as many others. I see him as divisive individual. One, who had little interest in Wake schools until the GOP won the majority.

    However, I strongly urge future commentaries on Barber should not include references to his weight.

    Barber’s position on issues should be the focus, as they cannot compete with our conservative views.

    And, references to his weight takes readers attention from the issue…and isn’t this what we want?

    1. Yeah. Fat rat bastard vs rat bastard. The fat is bad for us, so we start thinking of ways to trim the fat. But, if you trim the fat off, like say a porter house, you’ll lose the flavor added by the fat, and flavor is important to most people when eating steak. I like mine grilled. I remember one 4th of July, back in the 60’s,….but what were we talkin about?

  4. Let’s be honest. Rev. Barber is about the only leader the Democrats have left. Who else is there? That guy not current on his income taxes? Give me a break. The Rev is the only guy they got to photograph. And he is rather distinctive. I am thinking he may be the Dem’s choice to run against Pat in 2016.

  5. Why do we even give that communist rabble rouser race baiter Comrade Barber the time of day, much less cave to his stupid demands? Why do liberals and weak kneed progressive Republicans bend over backwards to please scoundrels like this and so easily insult a large portion of native North Carolinians, their honorable ancestors and history itself. Governor McCrory has shown a disturbing lack of both backbone and judgement in this affair. A jellyfish governor will not do; not in these times.

  6. I am sick and tired of these race-baiters getting their way. And they win a battle they keep pushing on the next issue and the next and the next. Like unions, Saul Alinsky and so on. They are never happy and never really care about these issues,they are just into putting notches on their belts. How in God’s name is a Confederate Flag insulting to blacks? It’s history. The Gov made a bad mistake here. Spineless. Looking for more disppointments from him on these and other issues. I detest this unfounded race card and it’s time for our elected leaders to quit playing the game and call their bluff. This was a no-brainer that Pat lost for the citizens of NC.

    1. How in God’s name is a Confederate Flag insulting to blacks?

      1. God has nothing to do with the Confederate Flag.
      2. The South went to war against the abolition of slavery.

      1. You certainly sound like you are on crack, or perhaps just ignorant of history. First of all, it was Lincoln who started the war by sending a powerful war fleet to intervene at Charleston, forcing the Confederates to take Fort Sumter before the yankee warships were in position.

        Second, the south went to war over the enormous tariffs the north proposed and after the 1860 election had the votes to pass. Even Karl Marx wrote contemporaniously that ”the war is not about slavery; it is a war of economic subjugation by the north against the south”. Novelist Charles DIckens, a prominent anti-slavery leader in the UK at the time said essentially the same thing.

        One of the greatest statesmen of the 20th century, Sir Winston Churchill, in his history of the US entitled ”The Great Repubic” states that the main cause of the war was final rupture of a conflict that had existed since the founding of the American republic, between the advocates of limited government, originally led by Thomas Jefferson, and in the 1860s represented by Jefferson Davis and the South, on one side, and supporters of a powerful central government, led originally by Alexander Hamilton and represented in the 1860s by Lincoln and the north, on the other. Big Government won.

        The north won and wrote the histories, but if slavery really was the cause of the war, why was it that at Appamatox, the commanding general who was a slaveowner was Union General Grant, NOT Confederate General Lee. Both has inherited slaves through their wive’s families. Lee inherited hundreds of them about ten years before the war, but as a young army officer Lee had written that slavery was ”a moral and political evil” and true to his convictions, freed all the slaves he inherited. Grant inherited only a handful of slaves, in the border state of Kentucky, which did not abolish slavery until the US Constitution was amended after the war, but he kept them right to the end. Indeed, after the fall of Richmond, Mrs. Grant joined her husband there and brought along a couple of family slaves. At that point the only slaves left in Richmond were the ones belonging to the Union’s commanding general.

Comments are closed.