The left fawned over BarryO’s victory in 2008, describing the event as the coming of a ‘post-racial’ era in American history. In 2012, we have the distinct possibility of a true post-racial moment in American politics: two black Americans battling it out under the standards of the two major parties for the American presidency.
Herman Cain is everything BarryO is not. He can talk — and make sense — without using a teleprompter. Cain reached great levels of success via hard work, foresaking the path of racial agitation and political machine cronyism BarryO chose.
As more people get to meet Cain and hear his message, his following grows. Daniel Henninger, a columnist for The Wall Street Journal, appears to be a recent arrival on the Cain bandwagon:
The time is overdue to plumb the mystery of Herman Cain’s “interesting, but” candidacy. Let’s start at the top—in the top-tier candidacy of Mitt Romney.
Though he’s got the governorship credential, Mr. Romney’s emphasis in this campaign is on his private-sector experience. It’s good, despite the knock on Bain Capital’s business model. But measured by résumés, Herman Cain’s looks deeper in terms of working on the private sector’s front lines.
The details of his career path are worth knowing.
In the late 1970s, Mr. Cain was recruited from Coca-Cola in Atlanta, his first job in business, to work for Pillsbury in Minneapolis. His rise was rapid and well-regarded. He joined the company’s restaurant and foods group in 1978 as director of business analysis. In the early 1980s, Pillsbury sent him to learn the hamburger business at a Burger King in Hopkins, Minn. Then they assigned him, at age 36, to revive Pillsbury’s stumbling, franchise Burger King business in the Philadelphia region. He succeeded. According to a 1987 account in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, Pillsbury’s then-president Win Wallin said: “He was an excellent bet. Herman always seemed to have his act together.”
In 1986, Pillsbury sent the 41-year-old Mr. Cain to turn around their Godfather’s Pizza business, headquartered in Omaha. The Herman Cain who arrived there April 1 sounded like the same man who roused voters last Sunday in Florida: “I’m Herman Cain and this ain’t no April Fool’s joke. We are not dead. Our objective is to prove to Pillsbury and everyone else that we will survive.”
Henninger praises Cain’s work in trying to find a business-friendly solution to rising health care costs:
Pillsbury sold Godfather’s to Mr. Cain and some of his managers in 1988. He ran it until 1996 and served as CEO of the National Restaurant Association from 1996-1999. This June, Mr. Cain visited with the Journal’s editors and put the issue of health-insurance availability inside the context of the restaurant industry. He said the restaurant association tried hard to devise a health-insurance program able to serve the needs of an industry whose work force is complex—executives and managers, full-time workers, part-timers, students and so forth. Any conceivable insurance system would require great flexibility in plan-choice and design.
It’s from this period that one finds the famous 1994 video, now on YouTube, of Herman Cain on a TV screen from Omaha debating Bill Clinton about his national health legislation during a town-hall meeting. After the president estimates the profitability of Mr. Cain’s company, suggesting he can afford the legislation, Mr. Cain essentially dismantles the Clinton math, in detail. “The cost of your plan . . . will cause us to eliminate jobs.”
To get the chance to take on BarryO for the big prize, he will have to first get past Mitt Romney and a crowd of ambitious GOP candidates. It appears Romney has developed quite a bit of respect for Cain, telling a New Hampshire audience to vote for either himself or Cain, because of their business experience.
Mother Jones, a left-leaning investigative journal, paints a picture of Romney that could draw comparisons to the Richard Gere character in the movie ‘Pretty Woman’:
It didn’t take long—just six minutes into the 98-minute debate—for the moderators atWednesday night’s Republican presidential debate to take aim at Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital, the powerful private equity firm Romney helped start. Here’s that exchange:
NBC’s Brian Williams: “Bain Capital, a company you helped to form, among other things, often buys up companies, strips ’em down, gets ’em ready, and resells them at a net job loss to American workers.”
Mitt Romney: “That might be how some people might want to characterize what we did, but in fact we started businesses at Bain Capital, and when we acquired businesses, in each case we tried to make ’em bigger, make ’em more successful and grow.
“The idea that somehow you can strip things down and [that] makes them more valuable is not a real effective investment strategy. We tried to make these businesses more successful. By the way, they didn’t all work. When it was all said and done, we added tens of thousands of jobs to the businesses we helped support.”
Some quick background: Private equity firms like Bain are known for raising money from outside investors; using that money to buy up struggling companies; restructuring the companies (think layoffs, slashing worker benefits, and selling off pieces of the business); and finally selling the (supposedly) leaner, meaner businesses for a profit. One particularly infamous type of private equity deal is the leveraged buyout, in which a private equity firm will borrow a huge amount of money to buy a company, thereby weighing down the purchased company with debt.