College attendance a ‘Right’? (WRONG!)

Margaret Spellings, the former federal education secretary who sailed into the UNC president’s post with the blessing of a bunch of GOPe types in Raleigh, has declared college to be a “right” for all North Carolinians: spellingsedit

What if all North Carolinians reached their full potential? What would that mean for our state, and what would it take to get us there?

What if all of our citizens could get the kind of education they need? What would it mean for their lives and careers — for their families, for their children?

And what would that mean for our economy? For the civic and cultural life of our state? For our competitiveness and prosperity?

If those questions seem daunting, imagine what this university’s original charge must have sounded like back in 1776, when the ink had barely dried on the Declaration of Independence and Chapel Hill was still a tree-covered hillside. Our state’s founders declared, “All useful Learning shall be duly encouraged and promoted in one or more Universities.”

That, too, was a revolutionary idea. It was a monumental goal then, and it is an even bigger challenge to us now.

What is “all useful learning” for a student today?

We know the world is more competitive, and the best jobs of the future demand education beyond high school. We know there is promise and potential in every corner of this state — in every town, every district, every classroom. And we know that economic and social mobility help define the American Dream.

So, are we doing all that we can to create opportunity for everyone? To deliver on the promise of all useful learning?

We have a constitutional mandate to provide a quality education as free as practicable. At his own inaugural some 30 years ago, President Dick Spangler defined that promise simply: No one in our state is denied a college education because of lack of

Are we keeping that historic promise and living up to that ideal? Or has that challenge only deepened?

I don’t raise these questions because I doubt the greatness of the University of North Carolina. I raise them because I believe in it so deeply.

A new civil right

In the 18th century, North Carolina took the lead in recognizing higher education as the foundation of a free society.

Today, we must lead again in recognizing quality higher education as a new civil right — a vital part of our founding promise.

That means making education beyond high school possible for all. That’s never been done before — not here, not anywhere else. But it’s plainly needed if our state and our people are going to thrive in the century ahead.

We have one of the finest university systems in the country, what former President Bill Friday called a mighty engine, sustained by generations of hard workschool and patient investment.

But we also have too many citizens whose lives and ambitions are limited by geography, by income, by struggling K-12 schools or by tuition that seems out of reach. It can be easy to forget when you live in a thriving region or graduate from one of the state’s top high schools, but most North Carolinians don’t have a college education or the opportunities that come with it.

The opportunity to pursue an education beyond high school is far from equal across our state. A high school senior in one county can be twice as likely to earn a college degree as a classmate in a neighboring district. Statistics are not destiny, but a few miles can make a world of difference. We can’t allow a child’s future to be dependent on ZIP code.

Has this woman not heard of online education? We currently have soldiers sitting in Middle Eastern deserts attending college classes streamed over The Internet.  The Internet Age has pretty effectively knocked down all of the barriers associated with geography and zip codes.  

Nor can we afford to let economic hardship limit potential.

Today we are leaving behind thousands of capable students who never even apply to college because it doesn’t seem possible for them. Low-income students enroll in college at far lower rates than their wealthier peers, even when test scores and academic performance are the same. That’s a tragic waste of talent, and we must do something about it.liberalpublicschools

At a time when our state and our nation are growing more diverse — when the school-age population in North Carolina is almost 50 percent minority and growing — we cannot tolerate pernicious gaps in opportunity.[…] 

Opportunity gaps?  Holy cow.

There are plenty of wealthy kids who get set up in sweet deals by their parents.  There are also plenty of people out there who didn’t have rich parents to help, but busted their butts, worked hard, and succeeded.   Ronald Reagan and Clarence Thomas, for instance.  

My experience, as an instructor in higher ed classrooms, is that students with skin in the game tend to be the best, most serious students.  A popular scam on many campuses across the state?  Sign up for courses and attend them long enough to get your first financial aid check.  Then, disappear from campus never to be seen again.   Young people take better care of cars THEY bought as opposed to those provided by parents.  Homeowners tend to care for their residences much better than renters do.  All of this talk about “free college” coming from Team Hillary will likely be little more than chumming the waters for even more waves of freeloaders and scammers seeking to line their pockets with other people’s money. 

[…] It’s time to raise our expectations again. Higher education is a new civil right. Every child must be able to reach beyond high school. That has to become our expectation, our promise for a rising generation.

That may mean a four-year degree, a master’s or a doctorate; it could also mean an associate degree or a professional credential. Whatever form it takes, quality higher education has become a critical measure of our standing in the world. After a century of leading the way, we’ve begun to fall back.[…] 

This “fall back” is mostly due to a K-12 system that focuses on (1) teaching to the tests, (2) moving kids through the system to keep the government $$$ spigot flowing, and (3) nonsense like diversity and self-esteem.  Meanwhile, Chinese and Japanese kids are learning the skills they need to OWN US and RULE THE WORLD.  bart-simpson-576x264

How about maximizing the value of a college degree?  The preponderance of useless degrees on college campuses — i.e., women’s studies, gay and lesbian studies, music, education, art, political science — churns out a lot of folks into the workforce who have no useful marketable skills.

Cutting some of that kind of fat out of the course catalog would likely cut the cost of doing business on the campus.  So would digging into the bloated salaries and benefits for college faculty and employees.  Paying someone six figures to teach SIX HOURS a week is a farce.  A travesty.

The Internet age also cuts the cost of doing business.  Conducting classes over the Internet cuts the cost of heating and cooling a lot of buildings.  It cuts down on campus  housing costs.

All of this talk of “a new civil right” plays right into the hands of leftists seeking a new entitlement to subsidize.  Not everyone is tailor-made for the ivory tower.  My high school had vocational programs aimed at training kids, who probably weren’t college material, in valued skills that could help them support themselves and their families.

I have a bachelor’s and master’s degree.  I can tell you that some of my most valuable knowledge came from life experiences OUTSIDE the classroom and OFF campus.  I began pursuing my MBA nearly 20 years after earning my bachelor’s degree.  Thanks to my two decades of work experience, I found myself knowing more about the course subject matter than many of my professors.

Declaring college to be a RIGHT is a dangerous misstep.  Just like driving a car, it is a PRIVILEGE that you earn.  I can see lefties taking her language and running with it — suing colleges for flunking students or denying them admission.

Instead of setting up a new “right,” why not focus instead on making college a more cost-effective, worthwhile endeavor? 

6 thoughts on “College attendance a ‘Right’? (WRONG!)

  1. This woman is a disaster. Put in office by the feckless BOG appointees of the utterly stupid GOP legislature, she is beloved by RINOs, Jim Hunt, and the UNC liberal establishment. It is no telling what she will say because it is no telling what she is thinking. There will be no conservative reform of the UNC system as long as she rules the roost. I live in the Greensboro triad area and see firsthand the idiots running UNC-Greensoboro. We had hoped for change. Under the Republicans, it has actually gotten worse here. Believe me, the Raleigh GOP is just as corrupt as the Washington GOP.

  2. You have outlined numerous reasons to eliminate the federal Department of Education!
    Donald Trump will work with “we the people” to do that!
    The Trump Administration will need our forceful help in stopping the big government aficionados like Mitch McConnell, John Cornyn, Oren Hatch, Paul Ryan, Kevin McCarthy and 30,000 Lobbyests!

  3. What GARBAGE!!! Higher Ed has grown WAAAAY too expensive specifically because the FedGov has been WAAAAY too involved in all aspects of college- especially ENSURING PAYMENT of STUDENT COSTS to universities!!!
    First we must break the link between FedGov and Higher Ed. Do that by closing DoEd. NO MORE LOANS, NO MORE GRANTS, NO MORE COMMON CORE or other buttinski FedGov politics!!! Then make sure every kid knows he/she will have to WORK to earn money to attend college. Some can work to earn a scholarship. Some can work at the local Walmart or grocery store to earn money for college, then take part-time jobs to earn money DURING college, OR go to college on a CO-OP program, where they can attend classes 1/2 the year and work full-time the other 1/2 year. This is a time-honored mechanism that almost EVERY kid can utilize.
    College? EARN IT!!!

  4. Under Bush, Spellings doubled the size of the federal Department of Education and gave it near total control over local control of education. It is still inconceivable to me that NC Republicans, of all people, would bring her to our state. Why even bother to elect Republicans. You can’t believe anything they say. In practice, NC Republicans and their appointees are just RINOs–no different than Jim Hunt and his cronies.

  5. If Ms. Spellings believes a college education is a “right,” why hasn’t UNC eliminated its admissions office and adopted a first-come, first-served policy like the state community college system?

    If you’re going to gobble up taxpayer dollars and declare a public university education to be an absolute right, you’re going to have to let the unwashed masses into the ivory tower. Selectivity will be the exclusive domain of private schools like Dook.

  6. College is most certainly not a right. If everyone gets to go it means all the work and maturity high school students put in to go to college is wasted. Not totally wasted as they could go to a better school but wasted in the sense that, whats the point of trying in high school? If everything is free and handed to you on a silver platter whats the point in trying? Where is the sense of accomplishment and success? How does any of this prepare young people and students for the real world, which can be brutal and cut throat?

    The real problem is that people do not want equality because equality means there are winners and losers. It means you’ll get knocked down and have your feelings hurt. What people want is special treatment. They want a hand out, not a hand up. I am so tired of hearing that college should be free. If you want free college put in the work. Part time jobs, athletic scholarship, GPA/SAT/ACT scholarships, Church or businesses scholarships. There are plenty of options out there that people can and do take advantage of but only the ones who work for it. College is not a right and should never be a right. There is a reason it is called higher education.

Comments are closed.