‘Baghdad Bob’, meet ‘Greenville Tim’.
You may remember, during the First Gulf War, this peculiar spokesman for Saddam Hussein. He got nicknamed ‘Baghdad Bob.’ He would appear on
western media talking trash about the Americans, and saying everything was fine, all the while US troops were blowing the living hell out of his country’s military.
Well, it appears the child grooming lobby now has a voice in Raleigh, thanks to Greenville’s election of Dr. Tim Reeder to the North Carolina House. Despite all the evidence in the world, Reeder has denied vociferously that East Carolina University has been marketing sex changes to kids as young as FOUR.
Like ‘Baghdad Bob,’ and apparently like a lot of this state’s drive-by media, Reeder thinks we’re really stupid. You can tell us — or not tell us — anything and we’ll believe nothing hinky is happening or that everything is fine. *Nothing to see here.*
Raleigh Republicans and the drive-by media have been eerily silent on the growing phenomenon of state funded hospitals performing sex changes on young kids. One of Speaker Tim Moore’s top cronies got a do-nothing job at the nerve center of the sex change operations in Chapel Hill. Thanks to our work, and that of the Education First Alliance, the information is still getting out there:
In September, Education First published a series of stories about East Carolina University’s Brody School of Medicine’s pediatric LGBTQ+ Clinic for ages 4 and older.
East Carolina University’s Brody School of Medicine (BSoM) has started to see patients for the newly developed ECU LGBTQ+ Health Clinic in an effort to promote access to healthcare for the LGBTQ community in eastern North Carolina.
“We also do not know of any other pediatricians in our area offering this care to those 18 years old and younger,” Dendy said.
Dendy said the clinic is not yet widely publicized because there are still some logistics they need to sort out. She said that LGBTQ patients are currently being seen by Dendy and Matthai in the ECU Adult and Pediatric Health Care Clinic for the services they want their clinic to provide.
Gender affirmation care refers to treatments that include surgical and non-surgical treatment to transgender or non-binary people in their gender transition, a time in which a person changes their gender expression or sex characteristics. Dendy said she believes gender-affirmation care for people of all ages should be included in primary care.
We reported that ECU physician and Republican candidate for NC-House 9 Tim Reeder publicly denied the existence of the gender clinic while ECU clearly marketed the services on its website and in news reports.
Now that Reeder has won his election, House Speaker Tim Moore has appointed him to four committees that could boost the child-sex change industry beyond measure. Reeder now sits on these committees:
Families, Children, and Aging Policy
Health
Appropriations and Health and Human Services Appropriations Subcommittee
Higher Education
To recap: The man who went to great lengths to gaslight the public about ECU’s practice of sterilizing children (with puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones) AND psychologically abusing children into believing they were born the wrong sex now sits on the committees charged with funding and regulating the industry.
There’s more.
Reeder proudly boasted about his leadership role with the far-Left American Medical Association (AMA) during his campaign;
AMA lobbies hard for child mutilation practices:
“Gender-affirming care is medically necessary, evidence-based care that improves the physical and mental health of transgender and gender-diverse people.”
Here’s what AMA has to say about boys destroying Title IX and bills to save girls’ sports:
Measures pending in some states would require a health care provider to “verify” a student’s gender before allowing athletic participation.
Actions like these intensify the discrimination, harassment, and outright violence directed toward the estimated 1.4 million adults and 150,000 teenagers in our nation who identify as transgender or as gender expansive, which means they identify with neither traditional binary gender roles nor a single gender narrative or experience.
The AMA has gone as far as recommending that states stop including a “male” or “female” designation on birth certificates, saying the practice “harms” Transgenders. The organization obviously cares not about the rights of girls to have their own bathrooms, locker rooms, and sports teams.
But the coup de gras for the AMA came in October when it called for the DOJ to investigate journalists reporting on pediatric sex-change clinics to be investigated and jailed. The charge? Publishing “misinformation.”
But don’t worry, the team at Education Alliance refuses to yield to Rep. Reeder, the AMA, or anyone else who tries to stop us from exposing ECU, UNC, Duke, and other child butchery clinics that pop up in the state.
Reeder has the potential to weaponize his committee assignments in service to the AMA, ECU, and others seeking to groom our children and profit from “gender-affirming care.” Expect to see most Republicans in the General Assembly defer to the “medical expert” in the delegation – Dr. Reeder – when they take up the next Girls in Sports Act or bills meant to stop child castration and mutilation.
And expect Reeder to lie to the public about the perpetuation of policies that harm children and girls as he serves the interest of the monied WOKE healthcare lobby and boosting ECU’s profits.
If sane non-corrupt people decide not to attend the Republican precinct meetings this year we might as well kiss the NCGOP goodbye and good riddance. Other than the wave of new school board members, things look mighty bleak for the GOP at the moment.
I am not a graduate of ECTC, ECC, or ECU. As furious as I am at those that have and are perpetuating this craziness as well as those that have turned a blind eye to it’s metastazing, it’s probably a damn good thing for me that I’m not a graduate of ECAnything. However being a life long resident of eastern NC I make this suggestion,
CUT THE POLITICALLY CONTROLED $$ OFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would be one mad somebody if I had ever donated $ to this once most respectful but now tainted institution of “wokeness”.
Tim Reeder is employed by Vidant / ECU Health, which is a proponent of Obamacare Medicaid expansion. He thus has a massive conflict of interest in participating in any way on that legislation. We will see how much integrity he has on whether or not he recuses himself on that issue. His employer very much has a dog in that fight, so he should ethically not get involved in it.
Generally, politicians from corporate medicine should be avoided as corporate medicine is not on the conservative side of things. Vidant / ECU Health was rigid in following the establishment Covid orthodoxy, for example. They also brought in “woke” facillitators on phony racism issues that upset both their black and white employees. Then there is their involvment with the “transgender children” horror story. A doctor in a private practice who is not dependent on corporate medicine should be trustworthy, but those tied to corporate medicine are going to have puppet strings due to their employment.
It is hard to fight the money avalanche in campaigns that the politicians in bed with corporate medicine have. Reeder threw the biggest blizzard of direct mail I have heard of in a legislative race against his primary opponent, former Senator Tony Moore, who was to Reeder’s right. He also flooded the airwaves with negative campaign spots blasting Moore for having switched parties in the past, defining Moore before Moore could define himself. Moore did not seem to be able to raise the funds to counter that. It is sad when corporate medicine can buy itself a legislative seat like this.
It also raises question about whether ECU Health will be paying Reeder his regular salary while he is in the legislature and obviously cannot be working at ECU Heath very much if at all. If they are doing that, it ought to be publicized, and it also ought to be illegal. I know schools systems do that if teachers get elected to the legislature, but it is wrong to allow it because it creates a corrupt conflict of interest.
Wonder, is it better to be compromised politically because of profession or professionally because of politics?