The saga from south of the border: Does this sound familiar?
It’s interesting to learn that Palmetto State conservatives are having the same heartburn over their “Republican” legislature that we are:
[…] I am no stranger to the legislative scene in South Carolina. Since 2016, I have been at the forefront of the vaccine debate, Certificate of Need conversation and other conservative issues – and have challenged legislative bodies from the federal to the state level to pay attention and do the right thing. Prior to 2016, after numerous attempts at the federal level (to no avail), I switched my focus to the local and state level because the state is truly where the power to the people should exist. Furthermore, conservative legislation that protects freedoms and removes red tape should be no-brainer in a red state.
Over the course of six years in South Carolina I have been a part of the entire legislative process and I know it well. I have been involved in drafting bills, providing testimony at committee hearings, strategizing with lawmakers throughout the journey and have even been right in the middle of conversations as floor votes were taking place. But after years of observing failed attempts to drive conservative legislation, I found that being in a red state was not as advantageous as you would think. I remained diligent, however, and after the mess that occurred in 2020 that resulted in a supermajority in the General Assembly (and a whole new army of concerned citizens) I was optimistic for the next year.
Instead, what I saw was in 2021 was neither the will of the people nor even the will of the General Assembly. What I saw was the concentrated power of leadership, and cronyism unlike anything I have ever witnessed in my life. Future jobs promised, future leadership positions afforded in lieu of legislation that is good for South Carolina – but threatens what I can only surmise is this state’s own “swamp.”
I was done. It is insane for a normal citizen to spend time away from their family and job, spinning their wheels in a system that is not working for the people – a system which seems to be operate within a culture that is all about protecting special interests, lawmaking strongholds and political power.
Heading into the 125th session of the S.C. General Assembly with new leadership in place, there were multiple promises that this time would be different. Supposedly, the “doers” were now in positions of leadership – and conservative legislation was going to sail through the legislature.
Unfortunately, what has occurred amongst the S.C. House Republican Caucus this past week speaks volumes about the broken system in our state. Republicans are concentrating their time on creating “safe” spaces where secrecy continues, transparency is blanketed and lawmakers are afraid of having to justify their votes. A space where lawmakers are so concerned about losing their elected positions in primaries if their constituents were apprised of their records that they are working feverishly to try and muzzle their colleagues.
This is conduct unbecoming a Republican, especially one who knows the creed of their party.
Sadly, nothing has changed folks. The truth is many of the Republicans in the S.C. General Assembly are not working for you. They are working for their next committee position. They are working for industry and the promise of an increase in power. I won’t discount that much of these behaviors are due to the culture these guys are working within, but I am not going to fully excuse them because there are plenty of examples of lawmakers who conduct themselves admirably above all those pressures. Perhaps that is why they are being targeted. Rather than looking in the mirror and reconciling how their voting record might be the common denominator to their political future, a large contingent of Republicans are focusing on stifling their colleagues who call them to task.
Normal everyday people are bewildered as to why South Carolina struggles to “keep the Republic” while previous swing states keep sailing past us. Thanks to this culture, the façade of a Republican majority means nothing. We don’t need more Republicans. We need Republicans who are acting in accordance with the will of the people and not their own egos. Unfortunately, with this session starting off the way it has, leadership is again not leading the culture change. I pray the twenty or so legislators who are working to make such a change can make some headway. Meanwhile, I predict the 125th session of the S.C. General Assembly will continue to be a session of placating special interests. They will say they passed “conservative legislation” but it will be watered down and nothing that really moves the wedge in the right direction.
Of course, I hope I am proven wrong. […]
Special interest Republicans are a bigger problem in politics than liberal Republicans. It is too often all about power and self interest and they will sell out principle in a heart beat. What drives this evil at both federal and state level is concentration of way too much power in the leadership.
What needs to happen in all legislative bodies is what the 20 heroes just accomplished in the US House to force the leadership to open up the process. Conservatives also tried in the US Senate, but fell short to the truly evil Mitch McConnell. What is sad is that conservatives did not even try in the state Senate or House to replace sellouts Berger and Moore or to try to open up the process. Do our legislators lack the ‘nads of their federal counterparts?
Phil Berger is NC’s Mitch McConnell, and just as much a sellout to the liberal special interests and Democrats. Look at what he is tryiing to do right now on Obamacare Medicaid expansion. Tim Moore is following the liberal playbooks of John Boehner and Paul Ryan.
The problem is present in other states than just South Carolina. In politics generally, concentrations of power need to be destroyed and the process opened up. Most importantly, local party activists need to pay attention and if your legislator is part of the problem in Raleigh, find a primary opponent and replace them at the voting booth.
We should remember that it was Democrat power plays that created this concentration of power in the NC legislative leadership. We should hope that Republicans try to reverse it and spread power more equally among the GOP caucus.
In the Senate, for many decades power was divided between the Senate President and the Lieutenant Governor. Most of the lieutenant governor’s powers came from Senate rules rather than the Constitution. Then in 1989, Jim Gardner took office as a Republican lieutenant governor, and the Democrats could not stand him having any power so they amended the rules and handed what power that office had previously exercised to the President of the Senate. The Democrat given this gift of power, Marc Basnight soon became known as the most powerful man in state government.
In the House, there was a tradition that had existed for many decades that a Speaker only serve a single term, which largely prevented a concentration of power. Again, a Democrat power play brought that to a screeching halt. Carl Stewart, Jr. was Speaker and wanted to run for statewide office but wanted to do it as an incumbent Speaker, so he pressured Democrats to give him a second term, breaking the tradition (Stewart’s ego was such that his two sons were named Carl Stewart III and Carl Stewart IV). His Democrat successor, Liston Ramsey decided he was going to be Speaker for life and began the real consolidation of power. After several terms, his dominance became so abbrasive that a group of consevative Democrats and good government Democrats led by Rep. Joe Marvetic bolted and joined forces with Republicans to oust Ramsey and elect Marvetic as speaker.
One solution to all of this is Constitutional term limits for the top legislative leaders in both houses, and the longtime single term limitation from the NC House would seem to best standard and the one supported by history. The reality is that incumbent leaders would fight this tooth and nail. The way to move this forward would be when those offices become vacant to elect new leaders committed to such a move.
Another would be new rules like those in the US House to give the entire caucus more say in what happens in the legislature. Again the best time to move on that would be the next time these leadership positions become vacant, as incumbents would tend to resist such changes.