#ncga: Tilting at windmills

Inquiring minds WANT TO KNOW:  Is Speaker Timmy already screwing over a significant number of members of his caucus?  Apparently, so. 

Tim Moore was one of a number of legislators who signed a letter last week seeking the closure of Amazon’s massive boondoggle of a wind farm over in eastern North Carolina.  Moore and his cronies in the House Republican caucus have been fattened up with cash from solar energy sources — who obtain government money, then turn around and load up politicians with it in the hope of getting even MORE MONEY.   The solar energy mandates at the state level are up for renewal this year.  The solar goons spent heavily and bet big on Speaker Timmy and his team in November.  You can BET that those chits are already being called in. 

Solar and our state legislators have had a lucrative win-win relationship.  Why couldn’t the wind power folks try the same?  Speaker Timmy and the boys DO love cash.

Look what turned up on Facebook a short time after that letter protesting the wind farm went out:

 

If THAT is not a group that got its pockets fattened, I don’t know what it is.  Wind Power is about as bad as solar is in terms of being a waste of money and undependable.  Here’s a pretty thoughtful analysis of wind power from the UK:

While the arguments for wind power seem straightforward and compelling, Wind power would reduce our dependency on foreign oil, wind power is clean and would allow for the shut down of dirty fossil fuel fired power plants.
Wind power would reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Investment in wind power quickly pays for itself.
These arguments sound all too powerful and all make sense. Or do they?
First, there is the notion that somehow wind power will reduce our dependency on foreign oil. This hope is hinged on the prospect that wind power will somehow replace fossil derived electric power.
The problem with this theory is that wind is so unpredictable that anywhere from 80% to 100% of whatever new wind power generation is brought on line must still be backed up with standard generation facilities that can be counted on for their reliable power.
In the event there are not enough existing standard generation facilities in place, new ones would have to be added. Otherwise, the level of reliability of power availability would be jeopardized. Thus, we would be paying for two power generation facilities – the good, old-fashioned, dependable, dispatchable power plants, and the new, unpredictable, undispatchable wind power plants that may or may not operate, depending on how much wind is blowing.
Second, clean wind energy will be able to replace or retire dirty power plants. This too is not borne out by experience. Since the dirty reliable power must remain on standby to backup the new unpredictable wind power, there is virtually no reduction in the use of dirty power plants or the dirty fuel they burn.
In fact, when fossil-fired power plants have to be backed off to permit wind power as the primary generation mode, fossil plants burn their fuel less efficiently. In addition, when fossil plants must cycle wildly in response to erratic wind powered electric generation, they produce even more emissions, because non-steady-state operation is inherently less efficient, producing more emissions than steady-state operation.
Third, there is the prospect that wind power would reduce the effects of global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This prospect falls apart when you look at the facts.
Nature produces more than 29 times more CO2 than does mankind. Water vapor produces more than 26 times more of a greenhouse gas effect (GGE) than does CO2 (methane, nitrous oxide and CFCs account for less than half of the GGE of CO2). Fossil fuel burning accounts for 40% of all electrical generating power.
Thus, if 20% of our electrical power was replaced with wind power, the reduction in greenhouse gases would be of the order 0.00948%.
Fourth, wind energy is free. Well, not exactly. Wind turbines are always consuming electrical power to keep their own auxiliary systems functioning, whether the wind is blowing, or not.
All the publicity regarding wind power concentrates on the power it produces, if it is producing any at all. Few people are aware that wind turbines consume electricity, whether they are operating, or not.
Fifth, is the claim that wind power pays for itself. If this were the case, then why do they require subsidies to be brought to market? The only reason these things get built is upfront tax benefits for the developers.
After these benefits are exhausted, developers have no incentive to hold onto these projects, and cannot wait to unload them.[…]

Sound familiar?  Sounds a lot like the arguments against solar energy.  Yet, Jones Street found a way to get that crowd onto the state government teat in exchange for some fatter wallets and bank accounts.  It’s pretty clear — if we don’t lay the smack down early and hard — these whores in the legislature will find another teat for this wind power crowd to latch onto.

7 thoughts on “#ncga: Tilting at windmills

  1. The state Republican platform opposes government money to these ripoff moochers of tax dollars and jacked up electric ratepayer bills. Wind is as bad if not worse than solar. It is also a big polluter as this British newspaper article explains:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html

    Walter Jones has just co-sponsored federal legislation that would kick some of the props from under these wind energy windbags:

    http://www.beaufortobserver.net/Articles-NEWS-and-COMMENTARY-c-2017-01-24-285768.112112-Walter-Jones-fighting-windmills-near-military-installations.html

    Walter Jones is a real Republican. Tim Moore is an Obama Republican. People in New Hanover told us that Holly Grange was a big government liberal, and her participation in this excursion seems to bear that out.

  2. Looks like NC will be sponsoring laws in support of windmills this year. Follow the money.

    Saine gets a new suits
    Timmy buys a motorcycle or pays mortgage
    Hasting pays himself for future uncontested race
    Jimmy D borrows more money to be a yes man
    Nelson gets more caucus money to pay himself

  3. It’s a shame the Obama agenda didn’t follow him out the door. Enough $ causes a lot of individuals to compromise their personal integrity. The Founders warned of this day.

    Browny Douglas

  4. That mean ole Donald Trump is trashing President Obama’s green agenda. It is good that we have some progressive Republicans in North Carolina who will fight back against Trump and work to preserve President Obama’s green energy agenda. Progressive Republicans like Tim Moore, Nelson Dollar, Jason Saine, Bob Steinburg, John Szoka, Kelly Hastings, Holly Grange, and Jimmy Dixon are a real boon to our hard core environmentalist movement. I am sure that President Obama appreciates their efforts to preserve his legacy.

    This is just so so different from President Trump, who took the Climate Change page off of the White House website, is revoking President Obama’s climate change orders and rules, and is appointing people who actually want to look out for the consumer to the EPA and other government agencies Speaker TIm Moore and his followers are the anti-Trump.

  5. This is just another red light district, with the corporate curb crawlers and the political prostitutes strutting their stuff. The object is trading campaign contributions for corporate welfare. The corporate welfare that the political prostitutes want to give away not only gouges our taxpayers, but the expensive wind energy that would result from the corporate welfare would also gouge the electric ratepayers. It is better to have staffers engaging in real sex with lobbyists like in the Tillis days.

    It is telling that the political prostitutes in this sorry mess are all from the House and seem to be largely leadership, and that no Senate leaders were out there pandering. Brant, can you name and shame all seven of those House political prostitutes who were present?

  6. Here we go…Holly Getz Grange’s father:
    Illegal Gulf War Booty Almost Slipped By CIA
    Weapons: An attempt to sneak guns and ammo into the U.S. evolved into an embarrassing federal court case.

    The weapons in question, 54 in all, were powerful and exotic. The inventory included Soviet pistols, AK47 machine guns and grenade launchers; British submachine guns; Iraqi pistols; Belgian, British, German and Egyptian rifles; plus a 60-millimeter Chinese mortar; and an 84-millimeter Swedish training rocket. There was even a Hungarian copy of a Walther PPK, the sidearm favored by fictitious British superspy James Bond.

    Also in the haul were 1,800 rounds of ammunition.

    Getz is the central character in this saga; he has said he only wanted guns to give them away, as gifts.

    “This Getz is a blowhard . . . and he was trying to impress a lot of people,” said Assistant U.S. Atty. Michael Rich, who prosecuted Getz. “And he was one of these guys we call a ‘barrel sucker’ “–a gun lover.
    http://articles.latimes.com/1996-04-14/news/mn-58402_1_gulf-war

Comments are closed.