The ‘Cultural Revolution’ comes calling in Carolina


The Chi-Coms orchestrated a massive purge in the early-to-mid 20th century to eradicate any all all capitalist, bourgeoisie, and / or “traditionalist” elements from Chinese culture.  American leftists are trying it here with attacks on Confederate monuments and our nation’s Founding Fathers.  In North Carolina, we’ve seen it in the attacks on the Silent Sam war memorial in Chapel Hill, the war memorial statue in Durham, the forced name change of the football stadium at UNC-CH, and now a broadside against the man who founded what is now known as Duke University:

[…] The University has stripped Julian Carr’s name from the East Campus building that bore it for nearly 90 years.

The change comes four years after Duke renamed Aycock Residence Hall on East Campus because of its namesake’s history and amidst a national conversation about removing Confederate or racist memorials.[…] 

In the words of Joe Biden, this is a BFD.  Carr provided and developed the land that became the present-day Duke campus.  It had been Trinity College, and had been  at risk of shutting its doors.  But Carr came to the rescue.  (And this is the thanks he gets.)  MORE: 

[…] The Board of Trustees approved removing without dissent Carr’s name at its meeting this weekend, Board Chair Jack Bovender said. The decision was announced to the University in an email from President Vincent Price Saturday afternoon.

“Our campus is first and foremost an inclusive community of people, not of classrooms and buildings,” Price wrote in his email to the Duke community. “With each new student or faculty member who arrives here, with each new discovery made or perspective shared, this community grows and evolves to better meet the challenges of its time. The renaming of the Carr Building represents one such evolution, at once a reflection of how our world has changed and a demonstration that our values and bonds will endure far longer than mortar or stone.”

The Carr Building will be called the Classroom Building until a new name is chosen. Price told The Chronicle after the Board meeting that he does not have a set time frame for recommending a new name, adding that he is considering the building’s name in conjunction with other memorial efforts on campus.[…] 

Sooo — think about this the next time your alma mater calls you looking for a major donation.  If you give the money, what’s to stop the school from slandering your family name (á là Julian Carr or the Kenans in Chapel Hill) a few years or so down the road in response to howling from a handful of snowflake faculty and students? 

If I were the Carrs or the Kenans, I’d sue for reimbursement of every cent my family donated to these campuses.  MORE:

[…] The Classroom Building was the Carr Building’s original name before it was renamed in honor of Carr in 1930. The decision to revert to the Classroom Building comes after the ad hoc committee did not make a recommendation on a new name, according to the Duke Today release. Instead, the committee deferred the renaming process to the Board of Trustees. In its request to rename the building, the history department asked that it be named after Raymond Gavins, the first African-American professor in the department.

The Carr Building’s name came under scrutiny at the beginning of the semester, when Duke’s history department filed a formal request for the name to be reconsidered.

The request stemmed from the department’s concerns about Julian Carr, after whom the building was named. Carr donated the land for East Campus to Trinity College—Duke’s predecessor—and served on its Board of Trustees.

“It is a reasonable assertion to say that Duke wouldn’t exist were it not for the generosity of Julian Carr. It is also true that he was a virulent white supremacist,” Taylor wrote in an email to The Chronicle in August. “Both of these things are true about Mr. Carr, and I think Duke needs to tell this story explicitly via a full, academically rigorous contextualization of Julian Carr, and then we all need to wrestle with what it means for us today.”

Carr supported the Ku Klux Klan’s violence, and bragged about “horsewhipp[ing] a negro wench until her skirts hung in shreds” because she “publicly insulted and maligned a Southern lady” when he spoke at the dedication of the Silent Sam statue—a Confederate monument pulled down by protesters earlier this semester—at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. […]

That is an anecdote repeated ad nauseum by leftists.  Yet, we’ve seen no documentation to verify its accuracy or a context. It’s not beyond leftists to lie in order to slap us down and push their agenda forward.

And the whole ‘virulent white supremacist’ thing?  During segregation, Carr was known to employ blacks in his businesses and he heavily funded a vocational training school for blacks. He also sponsored and took under his wing a young Chinese boy in the United States who grew up to be the father of Madame Chiang Kai-Shek, the anti-communist leader in China who went on with her husband to found capitalist Taiwan.   (*If that doesn’t scream ‘virulent white supremacist’ …*)

MORE:

[…] The Duke Today release about the name change noted Carr’s contributions of moving Trinity College from Randolph County to Durham in the 1890s, but noted he was “an active proponent of white supremacy throughout his adult life.”

“He boasted about being a member of the initial Ku Klux Klan and ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. Senate in 1900 on a white supremacist platform,” the release stated.

The push to rename the Carr Building kicked off in the spring, when student protesters included it as one of their demands when they interrupted an alumni reunion event where Price was speaking. 

After the Robert E. Lee statue was removed from the Chapel steps last year, Price created a formal process for requests to be made concerning names and places of memory on campus. At the beginning of this semester, the history department faculty members—who work in the Carr Building—filed a formal request to strip Carr’s name and requested the building to be renamed in honor of Raymond Gavins.

Following the request, support for the change emerged from various parts of the Duke community. The student protesters, who formed a group called People’s State of the University, held a rally at the building in support of the change. […]

“The People’s State of the University” ????  Mao (and Marx) would both be so proud.

MORE: 

[…] More than 140 alumni of the history department sent in a signed letter that encouraged renaming the building, and Duke Student Government unanimously passed a resolution calling for a name change. 

This is not the first time a building on Duke’s campus has been renamed after its namesake’s questionable past has come to light. The first-year residence hall Aycock—named after an early 1900s North Carolina governor active in the white supremacist movement—was renamed in 2014 to East Residence Hall, though the decision to rename Aycock was reached through a less formal process.

The Board also supported the committee’s recommendation to create a display inside the Carr Building explaining “why the university chose to name the building in his honor in 1930, and why it chose to remove his name nearly ninety years later,” according to the Duke Today release.

The committee’s report said that it received more than 900 responses to an online survey requesting input and heard from multiple members of Carr’s family. The educational installment is a key part of the recommendation, according to the report.

“The unanimity of the committee’s support for the recommendation to remove the name is contingent on the creation of means to present educational and historical information on Julian Carr in order to preserve the record on Carr’s contributions to Trinity College and help the community understand his complex legacy,” the report stated.

“We note that no individual is perfect, and we do not pretend to sit in judgment on any individual as a human or citizen,” the report said. “But the white supremacist actions that Carr pursued throughout his life, even when considered in light of the time in which they were held, are inconsistent with the fundamental aspirations of this university, and removing the name will be a powerful statement that lifts up our values as a diverse and inclusive institution.”

[…]“Julian Carr’s legacy is complicated. His leadership of and philanthropy to Trinity College helped ensure that the small liberal arts school would remain independent and would have the means—and the land—to transform into the great university it has become,” Price wrote in the email. “But this same person also actively promoted white supremacy through words and deeds that, even by the historic norms of the time, were extraordinarily divisive and caused serious harm to members of his community. […]

8 comments for “The ‘Cultural Revolution’ comes calling in Carolina

  1. December 3, 2018 at 7:11 am

    Re: “Our campus is first and foremost an inclusive community of people…”

    Apparently not

  2. Raphael
    December 3, 2018 at 8:20 am

    It is downright Orwellian when a university says the exclusionary act of taking a university benefactor’s name off of a building is being “inclusive”. Newspeak is alive and well.

    Maybe they ought to return the benefactor’s money with interest to his heirs if they had the slightest amount of integrity. If they now think he is dirty, why keep his dirty money? Hypocrites!

  3. Charles Hickman III
    December 3, 2018 at 9:23 am

    “…a powerful statement that fills up our values as a diverse and inclusive institution.”

    This Maoist inspired movement of exclusion calling itself inclusion on our campuses is the reason I no longer give to my alma mater.

  4. Flyintheointment
    December 3, 2018 at 10:07 am

    Everybody is still waiting to see what reprimand or any other action is to be taken again the UNC professor who orchestrated, ER…incited the violent destruction of state property.

    • john steed
      December 4, 2018 at 12:38 pm

      That rogue professor should have been fired long ago, and since he hasn’t been, the chancellor should be fired for failing to do her duty..

  5. Eastern Mom
    December 3, 2018 at 10:16 pm

    Duke and Chapel Hill are both embarrassments to the history of North Carolina. It is time to with hold support of their athletic teams and hurt them in the pocketbook. Their attitudes are too subversive, and their students too biased for the general population of NC to support any current activities of either of those schools. Shame on the Boards of Trustees. The”faculties” have become so politically correct that the students will never know any history except that of divisiveness .
    I do not-know how much influence the Methodist Church has on decisions at Duke,but if things continue along the current path, the students and faculty will decide that the worship of God does not fit the communist agenda, and Duke will be just another Godless place.

  6. Larry G. Pittman
    December 4, 2018 at 6:42 am

    It’s nice that Mac Brown is back at UNC. It is way past time for Silent Sam to be put back where he was, as well. I have posted on facebook that the Board of Governors should overrule the Board of Trustees and put Silent Sam back where he was, in a manner to secure him against further vandalism, abd that the criminals who tore him down must not prevail, but should be made to pay for the restoration.

  7. Eric
    December 4, 2018 at 12:47 pm

    Not only should the Board of Governors overrule the UNC trustees—they should fire all these worthless, incompetent UNC Republican trustees, which they have the power to do. Enough is enough! These gutless wonders have surrendered to Antifa anarchists and the radical leftist Carol Folt. Why even have a Republican Party in NC at all?

Comments are closed.